Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
Link

October, 14, 2011

By Dan Graziano

Calvin Watkins has an item on ESPNDallas.com that says the Cowboys could look to trade either running back Tashard Choice or tight end Martellus Bennett in advance of Tuesday's trade deadline. Both are high-talent guys who haven't panned out and now seem extraneous in Dallas, so it makes some sense to see about getting a good draft pick for one of them. Watkins talked to Choice, who said he'd like to stay in Dallas but whatever, and he seems to think they have reason to keep Bennett around. Choice has shown a flash or two here and there, so a running back-needy team could take a chance, you never know.

Of course, the two biggest names being thrown around on the trade market today are those of Denver Broncos receiver Brandon Lloyd and Indianapolis Colts receiver Reggie Wayne. And those are big enough names to catch anyone's attention. It's hard to imagine the Giants, Eagles or Cowboys making a trade to get a big-time receiver, since all three of those teams seem fine with what they have at receiver right now and the price for guys like Lloyd and Wayne is likely to be high. I guess Wayne would be the second-best receiver on the Giants if they got him, but that doesn't feel like a move the Giants would make.

People will connect these names to the Redskins, since Washington's wide receiver corps has plenty of numbers but no real big names. A field-stretching guy would be a nice complement to the precision, route-running possession guys the Redskins have, but prior negative experience with Lloyd (with the Redskins and with Redskins coach Mike Shanahan while both were in Denver) almost certainly makes Lloyd a no-go. And since the Redskins' plan all offseason seemed to be to conserve resources to continue their rebuilding project next spring and summer, I'd be surprised to see them make a big move for a guy like Wayne. Sure, if they win this week and get to 4-1 the temptation will be to "go for it." And they should. But the Redskins are more likely to "go for it" by sticking with the plan that got them to where they are this season -- good defense and an uncomplicated offense designed to minimize the chance for mistakes. I don't think asking Rex Grossman to throw downfield more, no matter who they bring in for him to throw to, is in the plan.

But I could be wrong, and we'll surely talk plenty more about this stuff between now and Tuesday.
 
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
0
Please let it be Choice, i'd MUCH rather see more of Murray/Tanner.

I know most won't agree, but i think if we trade Bennett now it would be a bad move for our OL play and our run game. I think as we're trying to break in a new OL, Bennett is almost imperitive to have as a good blocking TE to help cover up their learning curve.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
Both should go. Neither will.

If I had to choose one, it'd be Choice. Give me a 7th in return.
 
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
0
Both should go. Neither will.

If I had to choose one, it'd be Choice. Give me a 7th in return.

I'd take a couple pizzas and some wings for him.. losing him and gaining that would make enjoying the next game so much easier.
 

Theebs

Quality Starter
Messages
8,534
Reaction score
0
I would love to trade choice and be forced to play tanner and Murray.
 

Jon88

Pro Bowler
Messages
19,523
Reaction score
0
I hate them both. They're both lucky they can play football somewhat.
 

NoShame

UDFA
Messages
2,797
Reaction score
0
I wouldn't give up either.

We'd get a late round pick in return... It would be pointless.

They have more value as depth especially as the season wears on.
 

Jon88

Pro Bowler
Messages
19,523
Reaction score
0
I wouldn't give up either.

We'd get a late round pick in return... It would be pointless.

They have more value as depth especially as the season wears on.

You could make the case for Choice but not for the other ******, who doesn't even want to be here.
 
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
0
I wouldn't give up either.

We'd get a late round pick in return... It would be pointless.

They have more value as depth especially as the season wears on.

I'd actually rather get rid of Choice.. i'd love to see Murray and Tanner get some reps and experience under their belt. I'd be just as comfortable handing the ball to them anyway, what's Choice averaging anyway? 2.5 yards a carry?
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
I would love to trade choice and be forced to play tanner and Murray.

yeah but if that happened who would do Choice's oh so difficult job of "stand where Tony tells you to and block the LB that is coming"?
 

Jon88

Pro Bowler
Messages
19,523
Reaction score
0
I just thought of this, if we trade Choice then who's going to step up and run out of bounds when we're trying to end games?
 

Theebs

Quality Starter
Messages
8,534
Reaction score
0
yeah but if that happened who would do Choice's oh so difficult job of "stand where Tony tells you to and block the LB that is coming"?

Erik bickerstaff he is coming back....I got sources
 

Hoofbite

Draft Pick
Messages
4,231
Reaction score
0
I've been a big supporter of Choice but he's just holding up progress right now.

He looks so timid when contact is coming that it's maddening. I wonder if he's just too damn deathly afraid to lose the ball again.

Whatever the case, I'd like to see him go somewhere where he can get more touches and try to get back to the form he showed when he filled in a while back. And, I'd like to see Tanner.

Bennett isn't going anywhere. What's the point now? That train came and went and now that he's in a contract year he might actually start to play.......maybe. I thought he would break out this year because of that but he looks as dumb and lost as ever.

Good thing he can block though. Every team can use a 6th OL on the field at all times.
 
Top Bottom