Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
It seemed so perfect. Dallas Cowboys coach Jason Garrett had traveled to the Southern Cal campus to observe offensive tackle Tyron Smith's pro day. It was the only pro day Garrett attended, and it bolstered the mock drafts across the country that had Smith going to the Cowboys at No. 9 overall.

But my much-maligned "top 10" mock draft that was chided by none other than Tom Coughlin took a hit Sunday night based on a conversation with a high-ranking Cowboys source. Call it a smoke screen if you want, but I now believe the Cowboys are far more interested in trading down in the first round than staying home and taking Smith.

The Cowboys take an offensive lineman in the first round once every 30 years, so maybe they're due. And if you're wondering, it was Howard Richards, a guard out of Missouri, back in 1981. If the Cowboys break from 30 years of history, it's more likely they'll take Nate Solder out of Colorado than Smith. There's a belief among scouts that Solder might be a better athlete than Cowboys starting left tackle Doug Free.

Several scouts have indicated to me that Smith has a "special" quality that Boston College's Anthony Castonzo and Solder don't have. It doesn't appear the Cowboys see it that way. They believe all three players will be starters in the league for the next 10 years.

If the Cowboys are able to trade down — the Redskins might be willing to flip picks — the most likely targets would be Wisconsin defensive end J.J. Watt, Nebraska cornerback Prince Amukamara or Solder. I know the Cowboys like Cal defensive end Cam Jordan (son of Steve) but not quite as much as Watt.

Dallas has also done a lot of work on Alabama wide receiver Julio Jones. But even with all Bryant's diamond distractions this offseason, it's hard to imagine the Cowboys adding another wide receiver in the first round. They have more significant needs at this point.

The only scenario I can see in which the Cowboys move up the board is if LSU cornerback Patrick Peterson somehow slips out of the top six. Like a few other teams, the Cowboys aren't convinced the Panthers will take either Cam Newton or Blaine Gabbert at No. 1. There's a consensus among scouts I've talked to that Alabama DE/DT Marcell Dareus is the best player in this draft.

If the Panthers decided to pass on a quarterback, it will obviously shake up the first round. Much has been made about how much research the Cowboys did on Newton, but they've also taken a hard look at Gabbert.

The Cowboys think Gabbert might have been better served to play another year in college, but they would be tempted to take him at No. 9 in the unlikely case he falls that far.

"It could be another Aaron Rodgers situation," said the Cowboys source, referring to how the Packers quarterback sat for three years behind Brett Favre.

I'll deliver one more mock draft after having a sit-down with TCU quarterback Andy Dalton later this week. He's one of the most intriguing players in the draft, and scouts say he could go anywhere from the 20s to the third round. And if you're wondering, it's highly unlikely the Cowboys would take him with that 40th pick overall. They don't feel a sense of urgency to find Tony Romo's eventual replacement unless there's extreme value (Newton or Gabbert).

As of now, it looks like Watt's the safest choice for the Cowboys. And if you start to see new names at No. 9 across the country, remember where you read it first.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
Where did you get this article?

The internet.


Kind of intrigued by the notion of drafting Gabbert and letting him sit for a few years. Not that he'd fall that far, but still. I like that we're at least considering it.
 
C

Cr122

Guest
The internet.


Kind of intrigued by the notion of drafting Gabbert and letting him sit for a few years. Not that he'd fall that far, but still. I like that we're at least considering it.

lol

Yeah, no shit where the F did you copy and paste the article from DMN or somewhere's else?

As far as Gabbert, yeah if he was there we would be stupid not to consider it.
 
C

Cr122

Guest
Wait. I thought taking a first round QB this year was stupid?

Not if their name is Gabbert, then you would have to. I wouldn't waste my pick with Newton.

The others I would consider is Locker, Mallet and Dalton at 40.

Overall though we need help on the OL and DL as well as safety. Which we already know this.

I don't think they make it to our pick though.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Not if their name is Gabbert, then you would have to. I wouldn't waste my pick with Newton.

The others I would consider is Locker, Mallet and Dalton at 40.

Overall though we need help on the OL and DL as well as safety. Which we already know this.

I don't think they make it to our pick though.

Gabbert's no blue chip prospect either. He hasn't run an NFL offense. His 3rd down numbers are brutal.
 
C

Cr122

Guest
Gabbert's no blue chip prospect either. He hasn't run an NFL offense. His 3rd down numbers are brutal.

I think he's a very good deep passer. He has good physical tools to start from day one.

Gabbert is talented enough to play at the next level. His decision making on third downs can be corrected.

If Carolina passes on him and a team like San Francisco takes him, Harbaugh is a smart enough coach to get him corrected in the weak areas.

No doubt he'll need some work in an NFL offense, but having the right coach makes a lot of difference.
 
Top Bottom