All of those guys are just pissed off that they were sitting at home watching. I'm not a fan of Cutler but he didn't seem to have a choice about going back in.
Of course they are pissed about sitting at home for the playoffs, and if you were to ask them to a man, they would tell you that they are pissed about not being there, and then seeing Cutler in the biggest game of his career of what would have been the biggest game of the careers of those pissed off players that are sitting at home, and for Cutler to punk out like he did only pissed them off even more. Personally, seeing Cutler on the sidelines like that reminded me of last year of how the Cowboys faced off against the Vikings in the divisional round, and it was Flozell that quit was on the sidelines chatting it up with the players, and now the fat POS returns to play in the Super Bowl, now that's a kick in the head.
Just to digress a bit, there is another thread on this board titled about second-guessing the Cowboys' decision to let Adams go and of course there are some posters that are doing just that, well I am not one of them. If you need to second guess that decision, then I advise you to go back to the Vikings' game of last year and see how Adams quit on this team. If he would have manned up and played we could of at least made a better showing, maybe even won the game. I know that Coloombo was getting the shit beat out of him, but maybe Jones would have interferred---and in this case I wouldn't have minded, and made Wade put Free in at RT.
Make no mistake, the Steelers are NOT in the Super Bowl because of Flozell is at RT. Adams is just there for the ride. He is in a place where they demand accountability, something that was lacking with the Cowboys. So it is foolish to think that if Adams was still here we would have won more games. The only game I can think that we might have won if he was with the Cowboys was the first game against the Redskins. He certainly would have done better than Barron, but that's not saying much.