C

Cr122

Guest
[h=2][/h]
by Jon Machota

The free agency acquisitions made by the Cowboys last week have done two things for the franchise. They've upgraded the overall talent on the roster and made it more difficult for opposing teams to predict what they'll do with the 14th overall pick next month.

Two of the biggest names in NFL Draft prognosticating, ESPN's Mel Kiper and Todd McShay, took part in a Monday podcast where they discussed what the Cowboys could do with that selection on April 26.

Kiper says the Cowboys are no longer forced to draft an offensive lineman like Stanford offensive guard David DeCastro because they recently signed Mackenzy Bernadeau and Nate Livings to fill that position.

But the franchise also invested $50 million into signing free agent cornerback Brandon Carr. Does that mean cornerback, a position widely considered an area of need, is off the board in the first round?

Kiper says don't be so sure.

"If you're the Dallas Cowboys, you need to play defense a lot better than they did," Kiper explained. "I mean they were, I wouldn't say sieve-like, but close to it. I think the secondary had all kinds of issues. I don't think necessarily that Brandon Carr is going to mean they go away from corner. I don't think Brodney Pool means they go away from safety. They need more than just one guy at those spots.

During recent mock drafts, Kiper has been in favor of the Cowboys taking Alabama safety Mark Barron. During Monday's podcast, Kiper remained consistent with his projection, saying Barron is a better fit than his college teammate Dre Kirkpatrick or South Carolina's Stephon Gilmore, two cornerbacks mentioned as possibilities at No. 14.

"I think Mark Barron is such a good football player," Kiper said. "He will shore up a back end [of a defense]. He will give leadership to a back end, veteran experience coming from [Alabama coach] Nick Saban that I think makes him a better pick than Kirkpatrick.

"I think he's a more consistent player. I think he's a better player than Dre Kirkpatrick. So I would go Mark Barron. We'll see what direction they go but I do think it will be a defensive pick for the Cowboys at 14."

Earlier during the discussion, Kiper further addressed why the Cowboys need to focus on the defensive side of the ball.

"I just look at Dallas, you're in a division with Eli Manning, who lit your defense and your secondary up," he said. "You think about the Redskins getting better with Robert Griffin III at quarterback, how quickly he transitions remains to be seen. If he's Cam Newton it'll be pretty quick. Bottom line, there's going to be a time when RGIII is an outstanding NFL quarterback. That's at least what the Redskins hope and we believe they're going to be right on that.

"You think about the Eagles with Michael Vick and what they're going to do."​
 

cmd34

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
119
I wonder if Barron is represented by the agent that is Kiper's personal friend. He has been known to hype clients of that agent.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
57,979
Reaction score
8,723
I wonder if Barron is represented by the agent that is Kiper's personal friend. He has been known to hype clients of that agent.

I know you are down on Barron for some reason, and I dont want him at 14 either.

But the guy is a good player at a position we need help at, and he is pretty good going after the football in the air. He's smart and has good instincts, and has had alot of success playing in Nick Saban's complex NFL style scheme.

He would be a good add later in the first round or early 2nd rd though, would be a clear upgrade over any of the other safeties on our roster.
 

cmd34

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
119
I know you are down on Barron for some reason, and I dont want him at 14 either.

But the guy is a good player at a position we need help at, and he is pretty good going after the football in the air. He's smart and has good instincts, and has had alot of success playing in Nick Saban's complex NFL style scheme.

He would be a good add later in the first round or early 2nd rd though, would be a clear upgrade over any of the other safeties on our roster.


He's a step slow and a strong safety only type. good football player? yes. difference maker? no.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
unless the DB is a safety no way we pick someone with our first rounder who is going to be a fourth starter/specialty player. I'm not in favor of picking interior linemen that high but at least they would contribute immediately. So would a LB. If Jenkins has another year like last year we'll be re-signing him. Kiper you're an idiot.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
57,979
Reaction score
8,723
He's a step slow and a strong safety only type. good football player? yes. difference maker? no.

He seemed to make a difference in Alabama's secondary in the SEC

You might want to look up his numbers, he's been very productive
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
57,979
Reaction score
8,723
unless the DB is a safety no way we pick someone with our first rounder who is going to be a fourth starter/specialty player. I'm not in favor of picking interior linemen that high but at least they would contribute immediately. So would a LB. If Jenkins has another year like last year we'll be re-signing him. Kiper you're an idiot.

I agree for the most part, although we dont know what the team (particularly Garrett and Ryan) thinks of Jenkins. If they drafted a CB in round 1 you'd almost have to believe they have no intent of keeping Jenkins after this year, and have made up their mind on it.

Although I'm like you, if Jenkins has another good year we'd almost assuredly keep him you'd think.
 

cmd34

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
119
He seemed to make a difference in Alabama's secondary in the SEC

You might want to look up his numbers, he's been very productive

Very familiar with him. He played with 9 to 10 future NFL players on Alabama's defense and against some pretty crappy SEC QB's. Again, good player, I just don't think he'll be anything special at the next level. I think if you put Barry Church in his spot at Alabama he would put up similar numbers.
 
Last edited:

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
57,979
Reaction score
8,723
Very familiar with him. He played with 9 to 10 future NFL players on Alabama's defense and against some pretty crappy SEC QB's. Again, good player, I just don't think he'll be anything special at the next level. I think if you put Barry Church in his spot at Alabama he would put up similar numbers.

Barron is quite a bit more talented physically than Church is
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
If this Barron kid is smart and athletic enough then I say bring him on. Is he a guy who can be a decent starter in your secondary for 6-7 years? Then who cares about his 40? I think dbair is onto something.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
Personally, I found Dre Kirkpatrick to be a more cataclysmic player than Barron, but Kiper may be right in saying that Barron is more consistent.

Courtney Upshaw looks like a 6 sack a year guy.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
btw, I pretty much glance over any opinion cmd makes regarding the draft, if it's not DeCastor, that white boy safety, or Brandon Little Boykins, they are either a gigantor reach, or suck.
 
Messages
2,064
Reaction score
0
I like Barron, just not at 14. Doubt we trade down though, since finding someone that wants to move up is usually easier said than done.
 

cmd34

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
119
btw, I pretty much glance over any opinion cmd makes regarding the draft, if it's not DeCastor, that white boy safety, or Brandon Little Boykins, they are either a gigantor reach, or suck.


yeah, I only like 3 prospects. That sounds like me.
 
C

Cr122

Guest
btw, I pretty much glance over any opinion cmd makes regarding the draft, if it's not DeCastor, that white boy safety, or Brandon Little Boykins, they are either a gigantor reach, or suck.

You forgot his homerism on every USC prospect that should wear an NFL uniform.
 
Top Bottom