dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
59,972
Reaction score
10,137
Chris Matthews Bombs on 'Jeopardy!' After Repeatedly Mocking Palin for How She'd Do
By Noel Sheppard | May 15, 2012 | 01:07


On at least four occasions, MSNBC's Chris Matthews mocked Sarah Palin for how he felt she'd do if she were ever on the hit television game show Jeopardy!.

In a delicious example of instant karma, the self-proclaimed brainiac got his chance to show America how smart he was in a special "Power Players" version of the show Monday, but came up quite short finishing dead last with the paltry sum of only $2,300 (video follows with transcribed highlights and commentary):


For those that missed it, Matthews was matched up against CNN's Lizzie O'Leary and former Obama White House press secretary Robert Gibbs.

Quite comically, the MSNBC anchor's first gaffe came when he couldn't even correctly request an answer to a question.

"Let's go back to, what is 'Crossword Clues E?' I mean, I'm sorry, let's go $200 for the category 'Crossword Clues E.'"

Matthews appeared to have his Joe Biden thinking cap on.

Host Alex Trebek finally read the answer, "At ____, soldier! Four letters."

"At ease, soldier," Matthews responded. "What is 'At ease, soldier?'"

Although the correct response was "Ease," host Trebek graciously accepted Matthews' offering.

A bit later, the answer to another question was, "Full name of the U2 pilot shot down over the Soviet Union in 1960."

Matthews responded, "Who is Gary Powers?"

Trebek prompted, "We need the full name."

Again channeling Biden, Matthews actually just repeated the same thing saying, "Who is Gary Powers?"

Trebek said, "No," and the audience burst out laughing. The full name of course was Francis Gary Powers.

And that's when things really got ugly for the arrogant Matthews.

With the category "Law and Order," the answer was, "A U.S.D.C is one of these, charged with the jurisdiction of a specific region."

Matthews responded, "What is a U.S. attorney?"

And this guy has the nerve to ridicule anyone. Where do you find "attorney" in the acronym "U.S.D.C.?"

Obviously, the correct response was district court.

Then, in the same category, another answer was, "In 1986, the Supreme Court ruled that the 'hostile environment' type of this can be sex discrimination."

Matthews responded, "What is a hostile workplace?" This brainiac thinks the same word can be in both the answer AND the question.

Of course, the correct response was sexual harassment.

And then the fun really began in the category "6-Letter World Capitals" with the answer, "St. Basil's Cathedral is there."

Readers are once again reminded the category was "6-Letter World Capitals."

Almost astonishingly, the pompous and holier-than-thou Matthews responded, "What is Istanbul?"

The correct response - containing six letters and not eight! - was Moscow.

As such, when Double Jeopardy! ended, Matthews had a whopping $4,600, almost $10,000 behind O'Leary and over $8,000 less than Gibbs.

As they all missed a very tough Final Jeopardy! question, the game concluded with Gibbs having $5,600, O'Leary $4,200, and Matthews pulling up the rear at only $2,300.

This from a man who on October 2, 2008, shortly before that evening's Vice Presidential debate, said of Palin:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓
"Is this [vice presidential debate] about her brain power?... Do you think cute will beat brains?...Do you think she’d do better on the questions on Jeopardy! or the interview they do during a half-time?...My suspicion is that she has the same lack of intellectual curiosity that the President of the United States has right now and that is scary!"

Then on January 12, 2010:

They find these empty vessels who know nothing about the world! Nothing about foreign policy! Who immediately begin to spout the neo-con line. I read her book — it’s full of that crap....It’s unbelievable how little this woman knows!...Don’t put her on Jeopardy!”

And again on November 2, 2010:

“Senator, do you think Sarah Palin is qualified to be President of the United States?...If she were on Jeopardy! right now and the topic was national government, American government generally defined, would she look like an imbecile, or would she look okay? Does she know anything?"

And finally on January 19, 2011:

“I’d like to see her on just a couple of episodes of Celebrity Jeopardy! or It’s Academic Mac McGarry to just see if she knows anything.”

Well, Chris, America just saw you on Jeopardy!, and you came in last with only $2,300 missing what most viewers likely thought were pretty easy questions.

What's that they say about people in glass houses?



Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-s...ed-do-jeopardy-matthews-comes-l#ixzz1uxd8aXqO
 

Cythim

2
Messages
3,919
Reaction score
0
I've got no love for Chris Matthews, I don't think I've ever watched his show. However, it is a petty man that actually takes the time to write or even read this stupid article. He was dumb for suggesting someone would bomb on Jeopardy (mostly because it can be all too easy for anyone to bomb on Jeopardy) and this article is even dumber for going through every single wrong answer of his.
 

lons

UDFA
Messages
1,630
Reaction score
100
It's petty,racist, hypocrisy, (insert whatever you like here, they will just make up a new word) when a Conservative does it.

It's pointing out facts when a liberal does it.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
59,972
Reaction score
10,137
I've got no love for Chris Matthews, I don't think I've ever watched his show. However, it is a petty man that actually takes the time to write or even read this stupid article. He was dumb for suggesting someone would bomb on Jeopardy (mostly because it can be all too easy for anyone to bomb on Jeopardy) and this article is even dumber for going through every single wrong answer of his.

so you agree he's a liberal douchebag, good
 

Cythim

2
Messages
3,919
Reaction score
0
It's petty,racist, hypocrisy, (insert whatever you like here, they will just make up a new word) when a Conservative does it.

It's pointing out facts when a liberal does it.

Huge difference between Rush attacking a woman by calling her a whore and demanding to see her have sex on the internet and an idiot making himself look like an ass by turning into his own jokes. I wouldn't expect you to be able see it though.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
59,972
Reaction score
10,137
This certainly makes him look like a douchebag but I really couldn't say as I have never paid attention to him.

I thought you had a blow up Chris Matthews doll. I must have been mistaken, its Keith Olberman
 

lons

UDFA
Messages
1,630
Reaction score
100
Huge difference between Rush attacking a woman by calling her a whore and demanding to see her have sex on the internet and an idiot making himself look like an ass by turning into his own jokes. I wouldn't expect you to be able see it though.


You say Tomato, I say Tomato. It's the same Fruit.
 

Cythim

2
Messages
3,919
Reaction score
0
I thought you had a blow up Chris Matthews doll. I must have been mistaken, its Keith Olberman

I've never paid attention to Olberman either. I tend not to listen to bags of hot air preach about what the other side does is evil.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
If you're going to put yourself in the public spotlight you open yourself up to this sort of criticism. Doesn't really mean anything except that he sucks at Jeopardy but it was his choice to go on there, he has to deal with the consequences.
 
Top Bottom