- Messages
- 5,432
- Reaction score
- 0
If you're happy with a guy at 14, would you really not be happy with him at 9?
In three years, would it really matter?
For those who don't want to watch the video, the question was "Besides quarterbacks, who do you think is the most overrated prospect that'll still be taken in the first round?"
Kipers response:
"I'm gonna go with Tyron Smith, Offensive Tackle, USC. For this reason, I have him up there at that #10, 9 area but if you're picking 10 or 9, you'll get somebody normally in your top 5 or 6. I think if you look at Smith, he's got a lot of potential. He could be your right tackle, you're left tackle. You'd like to see him play that left tackle spot and maintain his weight at 305, 310 as well.
He's got enormous potential, but if you're picking 9, get somebody in your top 5 or 6. If your Dallas, move back. I think Smith would be more of a pick that would make sense more in the middle of the first round. Then if you're picking 14, and you get a guy like Smith you feel really good about it.
A lot of these offensive tackles are getting pushed up a little bit because they have to go. Everybody is looking for the left tackle in the NFL, but in a normal year, he would be a middle of the first guy. They're getting pushed up, Smith, even Anthony Costanzo from Boston College, they're getting pushed up because you got to have these guys."
That is virtually verbatim.
What a moron. He says alot of stupid stuff, but this is really dumb.
Stuff like this is why I dont buy his draft guide any longer.
If you're happy with a guy at 14, would you really not be happy with him at 9?
In three years, would it really matter?
What makes it really dumb?
read what he said man...it doesnt make any kind of sense
I read what he said.
What makes it really dumb?
Come on man, I know you are smarter than this.
If he is claiming Tyron Smith is now overrated and shouldnt be picked at 9 or 10 because at 9 or 10 you "should be able to get somebody in your top 5 or 6" what does it say about the teams ahead of you that passed on guys rated in the top 5 or 6? Is every prospect now overrated?
It was a moronic comment and doesnt make any sort of sense.
Then there's the fact that he is saying he has the guy rated in his top 10, but he's overrated and shouldnt be drafted until the middle of the first round. These are his ratings, so he should put the guy where he believes is really rated.
The guy has diarrhea of the mouth most of the time.
I mean, I happen to disagree with Mel. But to say his stance is dumb, and when it's coming from the biggest waste of board space in the history of the internet, well I just had to say something.
No. It was a moron comprehension, is what you mean.
Hey, Einstein. There is no set top 5 or 6. That list will change from team to team. What Mel is saying is if you get the 9th player on your board at 9, you really didn't hit a home run with the selection. And he's right.
Sure 32 teams will likely put up 32 different boards. But the players in the top 5 or so are fairly easy to predict and rate. Hell most years I can get alot of the top-10 right unless trades are made.
There's usually a concensus on who those players are.
If I can do it I'm sure highly paid people employed by these teams can do it too.
So if Kiper reasonably expects someone from a teams top 5 or 6 to be available at 9 or 10, it means some teams ahead of them have most likely reached badly for someone else.