sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Players bound for a leap year

Sam Bradford was great, but a Pro Bowl could be next. Who else could leap?

By Mel Kiper
ESPN Insider


No matter what they say, any coach or general manager drafting a player in the first round believes they are getting a guy capable of helping the team early. I'm not saying they expect it -- consider this year's draft, in which every quarterback taken should be given time on the bench -- but these are the most talented players in the draft, and in most cases, they target a roster void.

With that in mind, as I look back at picks I liked in the 2010 draft, as usual, there are some cases where a player taken in Round 1 didn't quite live up to all the hype. Either that, or the hype was so great that he became unfairly criticized. I'm not saying these guys disappointed, but whether it was perception or reality, they all had moments or profiles that had the critics out. Let's look at some first-round picks from 2010 who I think could be in line for a big jump in 2011.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Sam Bradford, QB, St. Louis Rams (No. 1 pick)

The results: Let's be clear: In no way was Bradford a disappointment as a rookie. Given what he was handed in terms of personnel in the Rams' passing game, Bradford was brilliant. The Rams put him in the shotgun a lot to ease the transition (in a league in which the shotgun is as prevalent as ever) and Bradford was outstanding. This is a league that saw Peyton Manning throw 28 INTs as a rookie. Young guys will struggle -- period. Bradford came out gunning, throwing 55 times in Week 1, and was trusted to deliver from the get-go. What I like most is the 60 percent completion percentage. While he didn't push the ball down the field a lot, Bradford's trademark accuracy didn't desert him.

Why the leap: The Rams didn't get a home run wideout in the draft, but they did get some value, with tight end Lance Kendricks, then wideouts Austin Pettis and Gregory Salas. I'd expect them to be actively looking for a pass-catching target or two in free agency, and between growth and added personnel, I don't think it'd surprise anyone to see Bradford already at a Pro Bowl level in 2011. He's that talented.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Gerald McCoy, DT, Tampa Bay Buccaneers (No. 3 pick)


The results: McCoy didn't have a great year, but he really would only be considered a disappointment next to Ndamukong Suh. What Suh did in Detroit, however, wasn't just good for a rookie -- it would have been great for a veteran looking for a free-agent deal. What we didn't see enough of from McCoy was the arsenal of pass-rush moves that had him higher on some boards than Suh. McCoy hurt his biceps late in the year, and ended the season with three sacks.

Why the leap: McCoy is young -- he won't be 24 until February -- and I saw him as a guy who would continue to mature both physically and on the field. But I mostly think he can jump because Tampa has added some pass-rushing help on the edges, which should force teams to make some tougher decisions in terms of blocking assignments. McCoy has all the talent, and should produce more as his fellow defensive linemen mature around him.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


C.J. Spiller, RB, Buffalo Bills (No. 9 pick)

The results: This was a really tough situation to land in. Buffalo needed blocking help and was unsure about what they'd do at quarterback, and they shocked a lot of people by taking Spiller. The bigger surprise is they didn't appear to have much of a plan to utilize him. That's a head-scratcher given where he was taken. Spiller isn't an every-down back, but he never had more than nine carries in a game in 2010, and definitely could have caught more than 24 passes. He finished the year with just 283 yards rushing. You can't draft a running back this high and get so little.

Why the leap: Spiller is more of a Reggie Bush-type than a back that should pile up carries, but you can't hit home runs unless you let the guy swing the bat. He has sprinter's speed, and if the Bills can trust him, they should use him. He should double his carry totals, and perhaps even more, double his targets in the passing game, where he can create big plays if you get him in the open field.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Ryan Mathews, RB, San Diego Chargers (No. 12 pick)

The results: Mathews didn't get off to a good start, hurting an ankle early. San Diego's passing game also became so effective, they seemed to go away from the run more than expected. Mathews had 675 yards rushing, but I thought he could have been a runaway for Offensive Rookie of the Year, and I think the Chargers believed he would be when they traded up for him.


Why the leap: If he's healthy, they'd like him to pile up carries. Mathews has the size and downhill running style to be a workhorse, and his average of 4.3 yards per pop wasn't bad. He just needs the carries. He got more than 20 in a game just twice in 2010 -- he could double the workload in 2011.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Jason Pierre-Paul, DE, New York Giants (No. 15 pick)

The results: Nobody expected Pierre-Paul to burst out of the gates. He was still a project in terms of adding pass-rushing skills, and wasn't going to start. He came on as the season wore on, finishing the year with 4.5 sacks, and flashed some of that trademark athleticism as he got more rotation time later in the season.

Why the leap: I saw 2010 as a redshirt year for Pierre-Paul, who was still a baby at 22, and he still showed flashes. If he gains consistency and the trust of the coaches, it'll be hard to keep him off the field even with some other very good pass-rushers on the roster.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Jermaine Gresham, TE, Cincinnati Bengals (No. 21 pick)

The results: It wouldn't have been fair to expect a ton from Gresham. He sat out the entire previous season with a broken leg, so rust was inevitable. He finished the year with 471 receiving yards and caught four touchdown passes.

Why the leap: Gresham is about as talented as they come at this position. With a year of experience under his belt, he's the sort of talent who can be an offensive centerpiece, not just a mere check-down and red-zone threat. Obviously, what the Bengals have at quarterback will shift his numbers, but he should be ready to take off.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Bryan Bulaga, OT, Green Bay Packers (No. 23 pick)

The results: Bulaga was very good in 2010, an All-Rookie offensive tackle who helped out well on the right side for a Super Bowl team. Hard to ask for much more.

Why the leap: Well, there's a good chance the Packers do ask for more. If Bulaga moves to the left, he suddenly becomes one of the more scrutinized tackles in the league, the blindside protection for Aaron Rodgers. The Packers went with a tackle in Round 1 this year, but they may simply look to do what they did with Bulaga, and send Bulaga to the role that gets more of a spotlight.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Notables: Seattle is serious about getting better on the offensive line, and they will be if Russell Okung can stay healthy. He's very talented, but you never saw him at 100 percent in 2010. Anthony Davis also has a lot of talent, and if he can improve his footwork as a pass-blocker, he has a bright future. He can maul in the run game, but he was a screen door on occasions. Hopefully Brandon Graham is fully healthy after an ACL tear. He'll flat-out get to the quarterback if he is. Sean Weatherspoon looked good when he was healthy. If Dez Bryant has his head on, the talent is off the charts. But his head has become a big question. Jared Odrick was perfect for Miami's scheme, but a broken leg never let him get started. I was shocked at how little Jerry Hughes saw the field. Will he rise to the challenge? The innate pass-rushing skills are there if he responds to the coaching.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
Jason Pierre-Paul, DE, New York Giants (No. 15 pick)

The results: Nobody expected Pierre-Paul to burst out of the gates. He was still a project in terms of adding pass-rushing skills, and wasn't going to start. He came on as the season wore on, finishing the year with 4.5 sacks, and flashed some of that trademark athleticism as he got more rotation time later in the season.

Why the leap: I saw 2010 as a redshirt year for Pierre-Paul, who was still a baby at 22, and he still showed flashes. If he gains consistency and the trust of the coaches, it'll be hard to keep him off the field even with some other very good pass-rushers on the roster.

I don't think this guy will really make that much of an impact. I still think he has another year or two before he'll show any sort of consistancy, if he has any at all.

Besides, that team has so much depth on the Dline it's ridiculous. It'll be hard to get enough playing time to burst on the scene with 8-12 sacks.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
He's now responding to himself.. it only gets deeper.

lol

Yes. Responding to Mel's comment is responding to myself.

How about your dumbass beg for VIP status again so I can laugh at you a little more.
 
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
0
Yes. Responding to Mel's comment is responding to myself.

You responded to your own post, did you not? It must be sad when no one even wants to discuss things with you anymore.

Not to mention you act like a simple, common sense statment about Dez having elite ability but being trouble off the field is pure genius when everyone already knows this.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
You responded to your own post, did you not? It must be sad when no one even wants to discuss things with you anymore.

Not to mention you act like a simple, common sense statment about Dez having elite ability but being trouble off the field is pure genius when everyone already knows this.

I posted an article from someone else. And then responded to something he had to say.

Something that's been done on these boards, oh.....a million times before, you f'n idiot.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
But wait....let's not let the Melvin steer the convo here.

Mel just exposed Dez. One of many. The list is growing by the day.

I say he's right. Actually....I would disagree that his "head has become a big question. I don't think it's a question at all. I think we know his head is retarded. The only question is how can we manage the ******.
 
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
0
But wait....let's not let the Melvin steer the convo here.

Mel just exposed Dez. One of many. The list is growing by the day.

I say he's right. Actually....I would disagree that his "head has become a big question. I don't think it's a question at all. I think we know his head is retarded. The only question is how can we manage the ******.

Wait.. so Dez has elite talent but he's kind of a head case?!

Shocking development here.. lol
 
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
0
No. He's not kind of a head case.

He's full blown ******. There's a difference.

Oh.. i get it. You're bitter because there's a "full blown ******" being paid millions for his talent while you're sitting in your bean bag chair with a jug of cheeseballs criticizing him on a message board full of people who think you are the full blown ******.

Makes sense now..
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
What a comeback.

I've been telling you morons for months that Bryant was a ******. To boo birds all around. And now Mel says it and it's common knowledge.

The guy's an idiot. A mental midget. A child between the ears. Don't blame the messenger. I'll still root for the little ******.
 
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
0
What a comeback.

I've been telling you morons for months that Bryant was a ******. To boo birds all around. And now Mel says it and it's common knowledge.

The guy's an idiot. A mental midget. A child between the ears. Don't blame the messenger. I'll still root for the little ******.

You mean he's a ****** like Irvin? Or like the "great" player who's teammates and coaches couldn't stand him last season? Or like the guy who continues trolling on a message board where everyone laughs at him 24/7?
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
You mean he's a ****** like Irvin? Or like the "great" player who's teammates and coaches couldn't stand him last season? Or like the guy who continues trolling on a message board where everyone laughs at him 24/7?

He's nothing like Irvin. I guess it's the number and team that brings that comparison. Other than that, I don't see any similarity at all. It's insulting to compare a f'n ****** like Dez Bryant to a hall of fame champion like Michael Irvin.

Moose Johnston said it best. And he's absolutely correct.
 
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
0
He's nothing like Irvin. I guess it's the number and team that brings that comparison. Other than that, I don't see any similarity at all. It's insulting to compare a f'n ****** like Dez Bryant to a hall of fame champion like Michael Irvin.

Moose Johnston said it best. And he's absolutely correct.

Elite talent but off the field issues doesn't describe Irvin? lol Ok son..

I guess snorting 8 balls of coke and "Big Ben'ing" women arn't off the field problems. Certainly, getting kicked out of a local mall over an argument is much worse.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Elite talent but off the field issues doesn't describe Irvin? lol Ok son..

I guess snorting 8 balls of coke and "Big Ben'ing" women arn't off the field problems. Certainly, getting kicked out of a local mall over an argument is much worse.

Who said anything about off the field problems?

Don't change your stance for better footing. I said he was a ******. Not that he had off field problems. That's way too general a term.

Dez's career has just started. If all he ever does is get out of a mall, he's golden. With that kind of intelligence level, I expect more.
 
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
0
Who said anything about off the field problems?

Don't change your stance for better footing. I said he was a ******. Not that he had off field problems. That's way too general a term.

Dez's career has just started. If all he ever does is get out of a mall, he's golden. With that kind of intelligence level, I expect more.

Not changing my stance one bit.. Dez is an elite talent with off the field issues. You said he was a ******.. not me bud.

Irvin was an elite talent, with off the field issues.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Not changing my stance one bit.. Dez is an elite talent with off the field issues. You said he was a ******.. not me bud.

Irvin was an elite talent, with off the field issues.

Wait. Let's review....

Kiper says Bryant has a big question with his head.

I say he's right.

You say hahahahaha! he's answering his own posts.

I say I'm responding to Mel's comment. About Dez's head. Something I've said since he was drafted.

You say well duh. Tell us something we don't know. But then turn a question of his lack of intelligence to a more general off the field problems.

Nobody said a word about off the field issues. We're talking about intelligence. Many players have off the field issues. That doesn't make those players actually retarded mentally. Like Dez.
 
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
0
Wait. Let's review....


Nobody said a word about off the field issues. We're talking about intelligence. Many players have off the field issues. That doesn't make those players actually retarded mentally. Like Dez.

Generally players of a high intelligence don't let themselves get into all of these off the field problems.. there is a correlation there that is pretty obvious.

Is it your contention that Irvin was acting very intelligently back in his day?
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Generally players of a high intelligence don't let themselves get into all of these off the field problems.. there is a correlation there that is pretty obvious.

Is it your contention that Irvin was acting very intelligently back in his day?

Wait....so if a player has a drug addiction he's not intelligent?

Do tell.

I was always thought there was a clear distinction between a real ****** like Quincy Carter and a guy with off the field issues like Michael Irvin. But RoyDaHammer says differently. They're the same guy in the head.
 
Top Bottom