dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
57,917
Reaction score
8,696
Finally was able to watch it on TV, totally different perspective thats for sure.

Some things I didnt change my opinion of, but there were a few things I saw which make me more encouraged than discouraged:

1) They noted during the broadcast that the Seahawks defense led the league in yds per rush allowed and that no RB had gained 100+ on them this year. Murray blew by 100 and our run blocking was pretty damn good.

2) The red zone offense has got to improve, but we still came close to blowing this one away fairly early. On the first redzone possession Tanner had a solid 3yd gain on 1st and goal from the 8. On the 2nd down play Romo tried to throw to Austin in the backright corner, and it was incomplete. Appeared to be the same route Austin scored on in the Niners game (Kitna TD). They'll see on tape that Romo had Fiametta wide open for a walk in TD just beyond the LOS and to the right, he just didnt look at him. I suspect in coming weeks they'll start calling some plays where Fiametta is a legit option on some goalline play action pass plays. Teams are definitely using multiple guys on Witten when we are close.

3) On the next red zone possession, Murray just missed scoring on the long run from 22 yds out. They tried a play action from the tight formation on first down (well covered). More times than not thats probably an easy TD on first down, it was just really well covered here.

4) Bryant fumbled just short of the GL on the next possession. It was probably a play that should have been penalized (thus keeping the ball). At this point we could have easily been up 21-3 instead of being tied 6-6 at the end of the next possession.

5) The pass rush was a little better than I initially thought, although I still am shocked we didnt sack Jackson more. He definitely came close to being sacked 3 or 4 times and a couple of those dumb throws under pressure resulted in picks. Spencer probably had his best game of the year in terms of rushing.

6) Spectacular play by Spencer on the blocked FG.

7) OL other than a couple of plays really played well.
 

Freddie

Practice Squad
Messages
464
Reaction score
0
Re-watched?

Must not be married, amigo. I've yet to make it through the first quarter.
 
Messages
3,455
Reaction score
0
4) Bryant fumbled just short of the GL on the next possession. It was probably a play that should have been penalized (thus keeping the ball). At this point we could have easily been up 21-3 instead of being tied 6-6 at the end of the next possession.

Why is that? He wasn’t a defenseless receiver.

I also think the main problem in the redzone is Romo looks Wittens direction too often.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
57,917
Reaction score
8,696
Why is that? He wasn’t a defenseless receiver.

I also think the main problem in the redzone is Romo looks Wittens direction too often.

The guy led with the elbow into the head. I thought this was something they said was now a penalty regardless of who the player is thats hit (used to be only the QBB I think)
 
Messages
3,455
Reaction score
0
The guy led with the elbow into the head. I thought this was something they said was now a penalty regardless of who the player is thats hit (used to be only the QBB I think)

I don’t recall seeing any penalties called that way this year. That could be a new rule and not enforced, i don’t know. My understanding of the rule was they had to be defenseless.
 
Messages
1,274
Reaction score
0
I don't think it was a penalty, he was keeping him out of the end zone and I did not see him take any type of cheap shot.

The biggest reason why we suck in the red zone is that they know the middle will be collapsed because Costa gets pushed 3 yards back in the backfield. We should be able to run off of one of the guards, but we can't.
 
Messages
4,952
Reaction score
0
That Dez fumble was just the seahawks stacking one good football play on top of another good football play. Dez goes out of his way to prove why he's an idiot sometimes. Ridiculous beast talent and no brains.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
I don’t recall seeing any penalties called that way this year. That could be a new rule and not enforced, i don’t know. My understanding of the rule was they had to be defenseless.

I believe they changed it so that defenders can't spear players in the back. Probably because it's a new rule, refs are having a hard time getting it into their system to call it.
 
Messages
10,636
Reaction score
0
DEz fumbles trying to make a play for his team thats pathetic in the redzone and he's a dummy? People are way too hard on DEz
 
Messages
10,636
Reaction score
0
Couldn't the same be said for the Romo fumble against the Jets?


Yes, that's why I didn't really give him shit. It was a close play and it has nothing to do with "choking".


But there is a difference between your best offensive player makIng something happen and your 6'2", 31 year old QB in the open field. There's a reason qb's slide and most good ball carriers can go untouched if they're in the open field . It's what they're paid to do
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
Yes, that's why I didn't really give him shit. It was a close play and it has nothing to do with "choking".


But there is a difference between your best offensive player makIng something happen and your 6'2", 31 year old QB in the open field. There's a reason qb's slide and most good ball carriers can go untouched if they're in the open field . It's what they're paid to do

lol
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
57,917
Reaction score
8,696
That Dez fumble was just the seahawks stacking one good football play on top of another good football play. Dez goes out of his way to prove why he's an idiot sometimes. Ridiculous beast talent and no brains.

I dont see where he did anything wrong. He was trying to score a TD. Michael Irvin made a living off running that same type route down there, and scored uite a few tds doing it.
 
Top Bottom