sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Nothing New

Jones Won't Dismiss Taking Cam

Nick Eatman
DallasCowboys.com Staff Writer


INDIANAPOLIS - The Cowboys are no strangers to national headlines, especially at the NFL Scouting Combine in a year they own a Top 10 pick in the upcoming draft.

Certainly, Auburn quarterback Cam Newton generates attention as well.

So it shouldn't be a big surprise that Newton and the Cowboys have been somewhat linked together here in the early days of the combine. Basically, it has stemmed from the simple fact the Cowboys will indeed interview Newton. The club will meet individually with roughly 50 to 60 players while in Indianapolis, and Newton is scheduled to be one of them.

Regardless of draft needs, it's not unusual for teams, especially one with a pick as high as the Cowboys, to at least visit with all of the top players.

When asked specifically about Newton, Cowboys owner/general manager Jerry Jones took an overall approach.

"I wouldn't dismiss any player that's going to be in that draft and wouldn't express interest," Jones said. "So much happens with the circumstances that are there, not only on draft day but how we continue our process."

But Jones did add that quarterback is one of the few positions that doesn't need immediate help.

"But I do feel like we're in really top shape. . . I'm going to really say outstanding shape at the position," Jones said. "Obviously, a quarterback to draft right now is a future consideration. For that reason, I wouldn't dismiss him or any position."

Newton, the 2010 Heisman Trophy winner who led Auburn to a national championship, is considered a Top 10 pick, but his workout here at the combine could jump into the top two or three selections.

By saying that drafting a quarterback would be for future consideration, Jones doesn't imply he would take one in the first round. Earlier in his visit with reporters, the owner talked about having two of the top 40 picks with No. 9 and No. 40 in the April draft.

"With these early picks, these guys have got to be guys that are on the field for us and contributors," Jones said.

It sounds like interviewing Newton is part of the process of the combine and it's way too early to dismiss any player, especially for competitive reasons. But reading between the lines, it sounds like drafting a quarterback at No. 9 wouldn't be atop the Cowboys' list of priorities.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Does anybody agree that our QB position is in "outstanding shape"?

Because I don't.
 

NoShame

UDFA
Messages
2,797
Reaction score
0
Does anybody agree that our QB position is in "outstanding shape"?

Because I don't.

Yea, I do. But we talked about this before.

I have complete faith in Tony Romo. I still think he is a winning QB and can get us a championship. The problems we had at the beginning of last year were not because of Romo . . . at least not in my opinion.

When it comes to our backups. . . Kitna is Kitna and I think McGee needs to be replaced. I wouldn't mind us drafting or signing a guy this year that could replace Kitna's backup role in the future. Or even allowing us to trade him.
 

SixisBetter

Anywhere on the line.
Messages
4,211
Reaction score
370
Does anybody agree that our QB position is in "outstanding shape"?

Because I don't.

I agree,but not because of Romo.

Mcgee is the least experienced QB on our roster,and I don't think he's our future.
Yes,he played decently,and yes it's hard to make that call based on what we've seen.

But I don't think he's the guy.
Plus,however well Kitna played in relief,his days are numbered.

The Boys need a solid #2 for the future.

It wouldn't hurt to take a guy late,or even bring one or two undrafted guys in.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Yea, I do. But we talked about this before.

I have complete faith in Tony Romo. I still think he is a winning QB and can get us a championship. The problems we had at the beginning of last year were not because of Romo . . . at least not in my opinion.

When it comes to our backups. . . Kitna is Kitna and I think McGee needs to be replaced. I wouldn't mind us drafting or signing a guy this year that could replace Kitna's backup role in the future. Or even allowing us to trade him.

So you think we're in outstanding shape but need to replace a guy?

Here's how I see it. We have an over 30 starter who is a notch below the top QBs in the league. A solid backup QB near 40 years old. A developmental guy who will never be more than an okay backup in the league.

Outstanding?
 
C

Cr122

Guest
This is Jerruh were talking about here, but no I wouldn't say we are outstanding at this position.

I'd say it's safe not to pick a QB this year at 9, there's other positions that need to be filled here like the OL and DL.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
57,623
Reaction score
8,289
Does anybody agree that our QB position is in "outstanding shape"?

Because I don't.

I think its in pretty good shape, better than most teams.

Romo is a legit probowler. Kitna is a very good #2 guy. You dont like McGee because we drafted him, if he were an Eagle you'd probably be talking about his tremendous upside and long term developmental potential. I dont think he's a sure thing as a future starter, but he doesnt have to be a future starter to be successful draft pick. If he develops into a quality #2 guy, he was well worth the pick where we got him.

There's no way I'd spend the 9th pick of this draft on a QB.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
There's no way I'd spend the 9th pick of this draft on a QB.

If I had what I thought was a franchise QB on the board I would. You don't turn that down. You don't wait until you have no QB to start looking for one. Some teams go 20 years looking for a franchise QB. To expect one to magically fall into your lap when you're needy is ridiculous.

Too many people look at the draft as an extension of free agency. It's not free agency. It's an investment in your long term future. It's the future core of your team that you then use free agency to supplement.

You take a QB this year and Romo will be in his mid 30's when that player enters unrestricted free agency. I'd say the timing is right.

And, no, Newton doesn't qualify as a top franchise QB prospect to me.

We'd be idiots to pass on a top QB.
 
C

Cr122

Guest
If I had what I thought was a franchise QB on the board I would. You don't turn that down. You don't wait until you have no QB to start looking for one. Some teams go 20 years looking for a franchise QB. To expect one to magically fall into your lap when you're needy is ridiculous.

Too many people look at the draft as an extension of free agency. It's not free agency. It's an investment in your long term future. It's the future core of your team that you then use free agency to supplement.

You take a QB this year and Romo will be in his mid 30's when that player enters unrestricted free agency. I'd say the timing is right.

And, no, Newton doesn't qualify as a top franchise QB prospect to me.

We'd be idiots to pass on a top QB.

So if Blaine Gabbert fell to us you would draft him, right?
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
So if Blaine Gabbert fell to us you would draft him, right?

Only if I had a franchise grade on him.

IMO, there isn't a franchise guy in this draft. So, no...I probably wouldn't. But if the Cowboys have that high of a grade on him they'd be fools to pass on him because of some irrelevant current need.

You'd have to remind yourself 5 years from now why you didn't want the top QB. Oh yeah, because back then we needed a blocker.
 
C

Cr122

Guest
Only if I had a franchise grade on him.

IMO, there isn't a franchise guy in this draft. So, no...I probably wouldn't. But if the Cowboys have that high of a grade on him they'd be fools to pass on him because of some irrelevant current need.

You'd have to remind yourself 5 years from now why you didn't want the top QB. Oh yeah, because back then we needed a blocker.

That's why I think we shouldn't draft a QB at 9. There's not one QB that blows me away when I look at their collegiate careers.

There was one but he stayed in school.
 

NoShame

UDFA
Messages
2,797
Reaction score
0
So you think we're in outstanding shape but need to replace a guy?

Here's how I see it. We have an over 30 starter who is a notch below the top QBs in the league. A solid backup QB near 40 years old. A developmental guy who will never be more than an okay backup in the league.

Outstanding?

Yea. But try not to hang onto one word that much. Compare us to other teams in the league. We have a pro bowl QB on our roster along with a good vet backup. Not too many teams can say that.

But I guess that depends on how you feel about Romo. Like I said before, I think we can win a SB with him.
 
Messages
6,827
Reaction score
1
I'd rather have a Gabbert/Newton on the roster instead of going through another Stoerner/Wright/Carter/Hutchison/Testaverde/Bledsoe/Banks era
 

Plymkr

2
Messages
2,126
Reaction score
0
Sweet,

Does this Cam puke play Offensive Line? Safety? DE? DT? RB? No, he doesn't. God, if this happens.

QB situation is by FAR the least of the Cowboys worries.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
57,623
Reaction score
8,289
If I had what I thought was a franchise QB on the board I would. You don't turn that down. You don't wait until you have no QB to start looking for one. Some teams go 20 years looking for a franchise QB. To expect one to magically fall into your lap when you're needy is ridiculous.

Too many people look at the draft as an extension of free agency. It's not free agency. It's an investment in your long term future. It's the future core of your team that you then use free agency to supplement.

You take a QB this year and Romo will be in his mid 30's when that player enters unrestricted free agency. I'd say the timing is right.

And, no, Newton doesn't qualify as a top franchise QB prospect to me.

We'd be idiots to pass on a top QB.

If Troy Aikman was available at 9, yeah I'd take him.

None of the QB's in this draft even remotely approaches that level, or the level of an Elway or Manning.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
If Troy Aikman was available at 9, yeah I'd take him.

None of the QB's in this draft even remotely approaches that level, or the level of an Elway or Manning.

Well then we agree. Take the franchise QB if that's the grade you have on him.

Now the question is do the Cowboys have a franchise QB type grade on Gabbert or Newton?
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
57,623
Reaction score
8,289
Well then we agree. Take the franchise QB if that's the grade you have on him.

Now the question is do the Cowboys have a franchise QB type grade on Gabbert or Newton?

I honestly have never seen Gabbert play so have no opinion one way or another on him.

Newton I've seen play plenty, and I dont think he's going to be any good in the NFL. He'll probably run fast and throw the ball far, but its the other stuff I think he fails on. The intangibles that made guys like Manning and Aikman superb arnt there with him. Plus he plays in a gimmick offense, and none of those guys has ever panned out as a bigtime NFL QB.
 
Top Bottom