dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
57,907
Reaction score
8,674
Hill and Watkins have been pining for a new Ratliff deal all preseason. Cant say I agree, as I didnt think Ratliff was very good last yr, and he has looked bad in preseason. He has two yrs left on his current deal. I'd at the least wait and see how he plays the first 2-3 months of this season before extending his deal.


August 31, 2011
Jones comments not off base, Ratliff has talked to Cowboys about a new deal

Nothing hapens in a vacuum with the Cowboys, so don't think owner Jerry Jones' seemingly jovial comments about nose tackle Jay Ratliff wanting a new deal came out of left field.

According to a source, Ratlff and his agent Mark Slough have talked to the Cowboys about a contract extension.

It is unknown how far long the talks are or if the Cowboys are receptive at all.

But Jones wasn't just making idle conversation when he brought up Ratliff while talking the about league's new collective bargaining agreement during the team's kickoff luncheon Wednesday at Cowboys Stadium.

"Jay Ratliff will tell you, ‘You’ve got a big issue, Jerry, with my salary. I need a little more money,’” Jones said. “We all want more money."

What's true is Ratliff is not only the top bargain on the Cowboys, he is one of the best bargains in the NFL. The only thing Tennesee Titans running back Chris Johnson and Giants defensive end Osi Umenyiora have on Ratliff is that they have publicly complained about their contracts.

But Ratliff has made three straight Pro Bowls since signing a five-year, $20.5 million deal in 2008. He will get $3.75 million in 2011 and $4.875 million in 2012.

It was a good deal when he signed it because it came after his first season as a starter. But he has severely outperformed the contract since and now is easily underpaid. Consider than nickel cornerback Orlando Scandrick will get $10 million in guaranteed money over the next two years and has yet to make the starting lineup let alone be named to a Pro Bowl.

Slough doesn't deny his client has outperformed his contract and is underpaid from a football standpoint. However, he said it would be wrong to characterize Ratliff as unhappy. He also declined to acknowledge whether he has had talks with the Cowboys about a new deal.

“I would not characterize our position as unhappy, but I would agree with the characterization that he’s outperformed the contract,” Slough said. “We’ll let all the other discussions happen behind closed doors."

Slough said Ratliff understood his contract when he signed it and purposely hoped to outperform his deal. He would rather be a player who outperforms his contract than one who underperforms.

The Cowboys have certainly had a few of those around here, which led to the highly publicized business decisions made over last month _ namely the departure of several highly paid but underperforming veterans like Roy Williams, Leonard Davis, Marion Barber and Andre Gurode.

Ratliff and Slough also understand what's going on with the economy and have no interest in complaining publicly about being underpaid.

Making any renegotiation tricky for the Cowboys is that Ratliff has two years left on his deal. Doing something now would set a precedent the Cowboys don't want to have to follow.

But the facts are that Ratliff is underpaid.

And he needs a new deal while he is in the prime of his career. Waiting two more years could be too late for Ratliff, considering the toll playing nose tackle takes on the body.

The first step is acknowledgment.

Jones did as much on Wednesday.

Clarence E. Hill Jr.


Read more: http://sportsblogs.star-telegram.co...e-cowboys-about-a-new-deal.html#ixzz1WhDsC3Aa
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
This would be a bad deal. We'd be paying huge money to a declining player.

I don't like it one bit.
 

Theebs

Quality Starter
Messages
8,534
Reaction score
0
weird situation. One of our most important players, one of our leaders and one of our best players...

problem is he hasnt played as well as in previous years and in a 2 gap front he has been double teamed and pushed around here this preseason in the 2 games he played.

considering the releases of vets and the in between building, re-tooling of the organization from the ground up....

giving money to ratliff would be paying for past performance it appears....hopefully not but it could be and wouldnt make sense with the new organizational philosophy.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
I'm sure we're waiting to see how he performs this year. If he can show a return to form, and we can work out a decent short-term raise, then let's do it. If not, like theebs said this is like one of those bad deals we handed out when we thought we were on the cusp.
 
Messages
8,660
Reaction score
0
Slough said Ratliff understood his contract when he signed it and purposely hoped to outperform his deal. He would rather be a player who outperforms his contract than one who underperforms.
Yeah, same here Jay. Be careful what you wish for. You may find yourself without a job in a couple years if you underperform your extension.
 

jiggyfly

In the Rotation
Messages
712
Reaction score
0
I think to many people are judging Ratliff on his 8 sack season, he is still a upper tier player.

This business that he has not played well in 2 seasons is bullshit, he is still consistently double teamed and the team finished 15 against the run last year.
 
Messages
6,827
Reaction score
1
I think to many people are judging Ratliff on his 8 sack season, he is still a upper tier player.

This business that he has not played well in 2 seasons is bullshit, he is still consistently double teamed and the team finished 15 against the run last year.

I consider that kinda shitty.
 
Messages
6,827
Reaction score
1
I love Ratliff. Love his intensity and his work ethic, but he has hit that 30 thing. Tough call. I would probably pass.
 
Top Bottom