sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
SportsDayDFW sports


Football coaches at all levels tend to preach to their teams about not getting too high or too low throughout the season. The message is to not rip yourself apart after losses while remaining humble following victories.

According to one of the greatest quarterbacks of all-time, there is a similar feeling when it comes to quarterbacking a successful team in the NFL. The idea is that you don't have to win the game by yourself, but be consistent and refrain from making the crucial mistakes that can sway the outcome.

SportsDayDFW spoke with Hall of Fame quarterback Joe Montana Thursday about what he sees in Cowboys quarterback Tony Romo.

"I think he does a lot of things well," Montana said. "I think he just needs to be more consistent. And I think that's what hurts him the most. You're going to have good and bad games, but you really can't have too many bad games. You can't sway too much either way on that needle. And I think that's what really keeps him from getting into the postseason and having success.

"When it comes down to that time, it's really on your shoulders and you've got to play consistent. You don't have to be great, but if you're consistent, you give your team a better opportunity."

After starting the season 1-4, a shoulder injury during a Week 7 game with the New York Giants ended Romo's season. Jon Kitna stepped in during the loss to the Giants and went 4-5 before Stephen McGee won the season finale in Philadelphia.

The way the Cowboys played under center was not consistent enough for Montana. And it is the reason he believes that they struggled.

"I think they played the way their quarterback played," Montana said. "When you look at it, it was just too up and down. They just didn't make enough plays when it counted, whether it was offense or defense. And that's pretty typical of what your record shows."

Montana added: "There's a lot of teams throughout the league that do the same thing. The ones that continue to get better and stay at playing at that high level, they don't have those kind of swings."

As far as the future of the Cowboys, head coach Jason Garrett will obviously play a significant role. Montana likes what he saw from the former quarterback and he is pleased that the Cowboys gave him a shot.

"I think he did a pretty good job there towards the end of the year," Montana said. "I saw him a little bit when I was playing, coaching style I don't know much about him. I just haven't been around him. But obviously he saw a way to motivate the team to get them going in another direction. So it's good to see that they gave him that opportunity."
 

Cythim

2
Messages
3,919
Reaction score
0
So now Romo is responsible for how the defense chokes games away? Brilliant!
 
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
0
So now Romo is responsible for how the defense chokes games away? Brilliant!

I think he's just saying that as the franchise QB, your team kind of takes on the persona of your QB, and everything comes back to the way you play. You have to go out there and set the tone, that you just arn't going to make many mistakes and the team sees that and plays hard to follow that lead. I don't think he's saying that Tony is completely responsible for how each unit plays, but i think it does have an effect to some extent on how other units perform. Like Joe said, Tony just has to come out and set the tone and be consistent doing that.
 

Cythim

2
Messages
3,919
Reaction score
0
Is that why the Bears made it to the NFC Championship game and had a shot at winning with one of the most inconsistent starting QBs?
 
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
0
Is that why the Bears made it to the NFC Championship game and had a shot at winning with one of the most inconsistent starting QBs?

But when its all said and done.. they didn't win anything. They were beaten by a team with a more consistently good QB too.
 
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
0
Even if you look at the Bears this season, what Montana said still rings true. With the exception of maybe one game all year, when Cutler played well.. they won. When he didn't, they lost.
 

Cythim

2
Messages
3,919
Reaction score
0
But when its all said and done.. they didn't win anything. They were beaten by a team with a more consistently good QB too.

The point is Chicago got there in spite of their QB, not that the better QB won the game. When Cutler was having bad games the defense still stepped up, performed and put them in a position to win the game. Chicago's offense turned the ball over 6 times against Washington but the defense kept them in it late and gave Cutler the opportunity to win. It was a similar story against the Giants, Seahawks and Packers. The Jets are the same way, performing well on defense in spite of their QB.
 

Cythim

2
Messages
3,919
Reaction score
0
Even if you look at the Bears this season, what Montana said still rings true. With the exception of maybe one game all year, when Cutler played well.. they won. When he didn't, they lost.

That is true of most QBs because you need some form of offense to win the game. This isn't about winning or losing based on QB play, it is about how the defense is performing compared to how the QB is performing.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Yeah, Montana's an idiot here. It's like he didn't even watch the first 8 games this season.
 
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
0
That is true of most QBs because you need some form of offense to win the game. This isn't about winning or losing based on QB play, it is about how the defense is performing compared to how the QB is performing.

You just said its true of most QB's.. which is exactly what Montana was saying! lol

You need your QB to play consistent in order to win games and go deep in the playoffs. Bottom line. Again, when Cutler played well this year, they won. When he didn't.. they lost. Its pretty simple. It all goes back to the QB, even if the QB isn't responsible for each unit's performance. I think you just misunderstood what Joe was saying.
 

Cythim

2
Messages
3,919
Reaction score
0
You just said its true of most QB's.. which is exactly what Montana was saying! lol

You need your QB to play consistent in order to win games and go deep in the playoffs. Bottom line. Again, when Cutler played well this year, they won. When he didn't.. they lost. Its pretty simple. It all goes back to the QB, even if the QB isn't responsible for each unit's performance. I think you just misunderstood what Joe was saying.

It is not exactly what Montana was saying, you are having problems understanding the argument. Montana is saying that all teams play the way their QB plays and that is only true to a certain extent. Romo had good games where the defense sucked and Romo has sucked when the defense plays well. When the defense sucks first Romo often follows because is he trying too hard to win the game. The Bears defense played great all year no matter what Cutler was doing and so did the Jets.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
When Garrett took over a 1-7 team, our offense was ranked near the top of the NFL.

Romo had nothing to do with the 6-10 record this year. Montana is talking out of his ass. I'd bet ya a beer he didn't even watch those games.
 

Plymkr

2
Messages
2,126
Reaction score
0
Who cares what THis jerkoff Montanillo thinks anyway.?

Oh no, I better not say anything.
 
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
0
Yea.. I bet Montana is the one who has no idea what he's talking about, not a bunch of fans on a message board. Please..
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Yea.. I bet Montana is the one who has no idea what he's talking about, not a bunch of fans on a message board. Please..

Again. Our offense was ranked near the top of the league when Romo went out for the year. And it certainly wasn't because of our running game.

To think a QB can't be let down by the rest of the team is idiotic. I'd be the first guy to blame Romo if it was warranted.

I don't care who he is or what he's done. He's wrong.
 
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
0
Again. Our offense was ranked near the top of the league when Romo went out for the year. And it certainly wasn't because of our running game.

To think a QB can't be let down by the rest of the team is idiotic. I'd be the first guy to blame Romo if it was warranted.

I don't care who he is or what he's done. He's wrong.

He's not wrong. Our O may have been near the top of the league, but Romo was also throwing alot of INT's before he went down as well. Romo has also been inconsistent in postseason games as well, only having a QB rating over 90 one time out of 4 appearances. Montana's point is absolutely correct that with more consistent QB play, you go farther in the postseason.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
He's not wrong. Our O may have been near the top of the league, but Romo was also throwing alot of INT's before he went down as well. Romo has also been inconsistent in postseason games as well, only having a QB rating over 90 one time out of 4 appearances. Montana's point is absolutely correct that with more consistent QB play, you go farther in the postseason.

What Romo has done in the postseason is irrelevant. He said the team played like it's QB this year. Playoffs don't factor in to that.

Considering Romo played better than almost all of the rest of the team I'd say it's one of the most ignorant statements I've ever read. Clearly the guy didn't even watch the games.
 
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
0
What Romo has done in the postseason is irrelevant. He said the team played like it's QB this year. Playoffs don't factor in to that.

Considering Romo played better than almost all of the rest of the team I'd say it's one of the most ignorant statements I've ever read. Clearly the guy didn't even watch the games.

Its not irrelevant at all.. actually nothing is more important to most fans than playoff success. If you read the article the first thing Joe talked about was the reason that Romo hasn't been able to have more postseason success was because he was too inconsistent.

As far as this year, the team did actually play like Romo, good enough to be in most games, but made too many mistakes to win them.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Its not irrelevant at all.. actually nothing is more important to most fans than playoff success. If you read the article the first thing Joe talked about was the reason that Romo hasn't been able to have more postseason success was because he was too inconsistent.

As far as this year, the team did actually play like Romo, good enough to be in most games, but made too many mistakes to win them.

His comment was the team played like it's QB this year. That makes prior years and playoff games completely irrelevant. You're only adding that because you have no strength to your argument.

It was a lazy evaluation made from a guy they couldn't fire quick enough as an analyst. Romo has that reputation. So assume that was the case this year when in fact anyone who watched the games knows Romo was one of the best players on the field. The team did not play as their QB played.
 
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
0
His comment was the team played like it's QB this year. That makes prior years and playoff games completely irrelevant. You're only adding that because you have no strength to your argument.

It was a lazy evaluation made from a guy they couldn't fire quick enough as an analyst. Romo has that reputation. So assume that was the case this year when in fact anyone who watched the games knows Romo was one of the best players on the field. The team did not play as their QB played.

He played well for the most part, but made too many mistakes to win. Same as our team. We were in every game, but made too many mistakes to win.

Im not adding anything.. read the damn article. All you want to do is cherry pick one statement rather than looking at his overall evaluation, and im not going to continue the discussion with someone who wants to pick out one statement that is debatable to try and further his agenda.

Continue with the Romo butt kissing.. meanwhile i'll be on my couch watching another super bowl that we didn't even come close to being in.
 
Top Bottom