sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Columnist Jean-Jacques Taylor answered your questions in his weekly e-mail newsletter - Inside the Dallas Cowboys. Here are some highlights.

Q: I hope that you can talk with Jerry to make him understand how important it is to sign or trade for — depending on a new CBA — Nnamdi Asomugha. We need him, and more important, we don’t need the stinking’ Eagles to sign him.

Steven Schreier


TAYLOR: I love your passion, but you can’t ever sign someone or draft someone primarily to keep them away from someone else. We don’t know what the rules of free agency will be, so we don’t know how much sense it makes to keep or release Terence Newman. And with a disjointed off-season, continuity reigns. More important, I don’t know that Jerry wants to pay a cornerback an average of $15 million a season.

Q: How noteworthy is it that if the Cowboys hadn't passed on Rashard Mendenhall three years ago, they wouldn't have had to spend a third-round pick on yet another running back?

Michael Roper


TAYLOR: It’s hard to say that, really. We don’t know how he would’ve assimilated into the team or the offense. The Steelers’ power running game may fit him better than the Cowboys’ multiple offense that focuses on its passing game. He’s never really been a good blocker, so maybe he would’ve been in the doghouse or lost confidence because the Cowboys didn’t use him on third down. Who knows? He’s a great fit for Pittsburgh , and I would’ve taken him because he’s a featured running back – not a niche guy like Felix Jones. But we can’t say for sure he would’ve been good in Dallas.
 

MichaelWinicki

In the Rotation
Messages
782
Reaction score
0
Neither am I.

Of course, I've grown kind of tepid of Felix as well.

I keep thinking that Felix is going to pull off a 1,300 yard season where he averages better than 5.0 ypc with about 12 TD's.

But it's like the saying, "Hold hope in one hand and crap in the other... Which one fills up first."
 

Plymkr

2
Messages
2,126
Reaction score
0
Dallas won't have a decent RB situation until they lose this stupid ass running back by committee.
 
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
0
I keep thinking that Felix is going to pull off a 1,300 yard season where he averages better than 5.0 ypc with about 12 TD's.

But it's like the saying, "Hold hope in one hand and crap in the other... Which one fills up first."

You don't think he put up a very solid year last season?

Meanwhile Mendenhall is putting up 3.9 ypc behind a solid OL.
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207
Dallas won't have a decent RB situation until they lose this stupid ass running back by committee.


The RB committee is not the problem. It's what you have that comprises it. Get rid of Barber, and see what this Murray kid can dop, and limit Choice's touches. I don't see why the Cowboys RB by committee cannot be just as effective as the Giants.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Pittsburgh's offensive line isn't solid. They've been mediocre for a couple of years now. Especially running the ball.
 
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
0
Pittsburgh's offensive line isn't solid. They've been mediocre for a couple of years now. Especially running the ball.

Scott, Pouncey, and Flozell all were solid last season. Even when the backup center Legursky had to come in in the postseason, he played well too.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Scott, Pouncey, and Flozell all were solid last season. Even when the backup center Legursky had to come in in the postseason, he played well too.

Pouncey was their best player by far. A rookie. That should tell you how good their offensive line was.
 
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
0
Pouncey was their best player by far. A rookie. That should tell you how good their offensive line was.

Does it matter that he was a rookie? He was a friggin Pro Bowler and 2nd team All Pro last year, of course he was their best player dingbat.

As i said, Scott and Flozell both had solid seasons as well.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Does it matter that he was a rookie? He was a friggin Pro Bowler and 2nd team All Pro last year, of course he was their best player dingbat.

As i said, Scott and Flozell both had solid seasons as well.

Yeah, you can keep saying it. It's still wrong. Pittsburgh's had a bad offensive line for the last 2 or 3 years. They have issues protecting the QB and they can't run block. It's like common knowledge. Hence them starting a rebuild with a first round center. And following it up with a 2nd round T this year.

To say Mendenhall ran behind a solid offensive line is just wrong. Better than ours, but not solid.
 
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
0
Yeah, you can keep saying it. It's still wrong. Pittsburgh's had a bad offensive line for the last 2 or 3 years. They have issues protecting the QB and they can't run block. It's like common knowledge. Hence them starting a rebuild with a first round center. And following it up with a 2nd round T this year.

To say Mendenhall ran behind a solid offensive line is just wrong. Better than ours, but not solid.

Its not wrong.. at all. They weren't great, but they were solid this year. Pouncey was an All Pro, and Scott and Flozell both played well.

They ran for 120 yards a game last season and Big Ben, who is not a very mobile guy, put up a 95 QB rating behind them. I'd say they did their job.. he said the same.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Here's an article from a Pittsburgh newspaper this past winter on that "solid" offensive line....


On the Steelers: New stat draws line on offensive line woes

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

By Ed Bouchette, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette


Mike Tomlin answered plenty of questions Tuesday about the shortcomings of the Steelers' offense, which has produced precisely one touchdown in the past 11 quarters, and that thanks mostly to safety Troy Polamalu.

The coach fielded questions about problems in the "red zone," about "17 holding penalties" in the past four games, about Ben Roethlisberger "getting hit" with little response from the refs or the league and about the quarterback's "injuries."

Tomlin offered little in the way of reasons or solutions, but there seems to be an answer so obvious it played the role of the elephant in the press room: The Steelers' offensive line is not very good.

That's not only the opinion of many but now a statistical "fact" from a formula devised by the mathematicians at STATS, one of the top statistical services covering sports and one used widely by the television networks covering the NFL.

The new stat, conveniently, was announced on Tuesday as the "New York Life Protection Index" with its first weekly ranking. The offensive line of Indianapolis ranks first with a rating of 90.6. The Steelers' line ranks 29th with a rating of 44.9.

The "protection index" does not rank lines in terms of overall effectiveness, just in the passing game. According to the website that will be updated weekly, "While the New York Life Protection Index is calculated using a proprietary formula, the fundamentals are comprised of the length of a team's pass attempts combined with penalties by offensive linemen, sacks allowed and quarterback hurries and knockdowns."

It is not surprising that the Steelers' line ranks way down there. Roethlisberger has been the most sacked quarterback in the league since 2006 and now all those holding calls are being added to the fire. Holding penalties often occur because linemen are getting beat to the quarterback by a defender.

"We've been holding and we need to stop," was Tomlin's solution to the problem on Tuesday. "We need to cut down on holding. No question holding occurs on every snap in the National Football League. I think anybody in the industry will acknowledge that. What we need to do is cut down on the actions that are triggering the flags, which is grabbing and restricting the jersey coming away from the body and so forth."

The Steelers' line has been hit with a rash of injuries this season that wiped out their two starting offensive tackles -- Willie Colon to a ruptured Achilles tendon in June and Max Starks to neck surgery in November. The team has had five different starting lines this season. Only rookie center Maurkice Pouncey and right tackle Flozell Adams have started every game.

But, as the STATS protection index shows, it's not a new problem for the Steelers.

Since 2006, only one team that finished outside the top 12 in the index formula has made it to the Super Bowl -- the Steelers in 2008.

The Steelers rank 19th overall on offense with an average of 332.4 yards per game, 10th in rushing with 120.2 yards per game, tied for 17th in average per rush at 4.1 yards, and 18th in passing with 212.2 yards per game.

Steelers quarterbacks have been sacked 35 times, tied for sixth most in the NFL.


Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10349/1110767-66.stm#ixzz1NbqtZmL6
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Now to be fair, their rushing numbers were a little better than I thought. I don't know what they finished the season at. This was written with a few games left to play.

But 17th in average per rush, a line who can't keep their QB upright....I don't think you'd call that solid. If anything, you'd have to give Mendenhall some credit producing behind that garbage.
 

Cythim

2
Messages
3,919
Reaction score
0
Back to back 1k yard seasons with 20 total TDs and a 4.2 rush average? I'll take that over everything we've seen since Emmitt's glory days.
 

Plymkr

2
Messages
2,126
Reaction score
0
The RB committee is not the problem. It's what you have that comprises it. Get rid of Barber, and see what this Murray kid can dop, and limit Choice's touches. I don't see why the Cowboys RB by committee cannot be just as effective as the Giants.

I think it is useless. Settle on a starter and ****ing go with it. Spell the guy every now and then, and run his ass to the ground. Jimmy Johnson style.
 
Top Bottom