Cowboysrule122

Draft Pick
Messages
3,728
Reaction score
0
By Todd Archer | ESPNDallas.com


IRVING, Texas -- The guys over on ESPN Insiders are not fans Insider of what the Dallas Cowboys have -- or have not -- done in free agency so far this offseason, giving them a D grade.

The only team with a worse grade is the Oakland Raiders, who earned an F.

The grade had more to do with the losses of DeMarcus Ware, Jason Hatcher and Miles Austin, than the signings of Henry Melton, Terrell McClain, Jeremy Mincey and Brandon Weeden. I understand that line of thinking. I don’t know how the Cowboys can expect Melton, who is coming back from a torn ACL, and Mincey (or any combination of the defensive ends on the roster) to be better than Hatcher and Ware.

But where I disagree to an extent is how much the cap held them back.

The Cowboys could have restructured Ware’s deal without any problem. They could have fit Hatcher’s deal under the cap. They could have signed Julius Peppers or Jared Allen once Ware left. They could have signed just about anybody they wanted.

To me, they chose not to. They chose to get out of the game where they pushed more money into the future. They chose to not pay thirtysomethings large amounts of cash.

So what I wonder is if the Cowboys did those things with Ware and Hatcher or signed a Peppers or an Allen, wouldn’t the argument have been the Cowboys are doing the same old thing?

If the grade is about the personnel, then I can understand it, but it’s too easy to just pick apart the cap mismanagement as a reason why they didn’t (or haven’t) gone after higher-priced free agents.
 

Jon88

Pro Bowler
Messages
19,523
Reaction score
0
Well then maybe they need to stop looking inside and look at what's positive outside.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
Maybe next time, the Cowboys won't extend players who will be over 30 during the extension years.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
58,546
Reaction score
9,042
This article is so far from the truth, it almost is laughable.

For us in the know, the fact is the Cowboys front office is well respected. As I mentioned in my other thread, its a known fact among insiders that numerous GM's and personnel people consult with Jerry to get his views on constructing a high talent roster capable of dominating opponents and winning multiple championships. Jerry has 3 rings, most in the league are envious.
 
Messages
3,665
Reaction score
22
A grade of "D" is charitable.

I'm sure the outsiders are basing grades on the extent to which offseason changes should result in an improved team.
 
Messages
8,660
Reaction score
0
Yeah if you're only comparing the 2013 roster to the 2014 roster as currently constructed, it's a solid failing grade. When you take into account the way they're dealing with the cap restraints they have it improves the grade a little. But there's no doubting this roster has regressed since January.
 

cmd34

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
119
This article is so far from the truth, it almost is laughable.

For us in the know, the fact is the Cowboys front office is well respected. As I mentioned in my other thread, its a known fact among insiders that numerous GM's and personnel people consult with Jerry to get his views on constructing a high talent roster capable of dominating opponents and winning multiple championships. Jerry has 3 rings, most in the league are envious.

Sad thing is, 2 years ago that was your actual take.
 
Top Bottom