Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
I don't have strong opinions on him, one way or the other.

I think he's best suited as a strong safety. And I think he'd show much better with a competent safety beside him.

I'm on board with the wide-spread notion of signing Michael Huff, and then keeping Sensy.
 
Messages
10,636
Reaction score
0
Its not exactly "keeping" Sensabaugh. He is a free agent wanting a big pay day. Same as the other free agents.

And its an entirely new defense so its not look he has continuity on his side
 
Last edited:
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
Who said anything about "keeping" Huff. I said signing him, which, you know, my sources tell me is all but a formality once the free agency period ends.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
I don't have strong opinions on him, one way or the other.

I think he's best suited as a strong safety. And I think he'd show much better with a competent safety beside him.

I'm on board with the wide-spread notion of signing Michael Huff, and then keeping Sensy.

Why? He can't tackle.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Safeties are supposed to intimidate.

Who the hell is scared to go over the middle against the Cowboys?

Nobody.
 
Top Bottom