JBond

UDFA
Messages
2,667
Reaction score
2
A recently released Department of Agriculture (USDA) report on the "Food Assistance Landscape" for the fiscal year 2013 shows that for the second year in a row, participation in the federal government's SNAP (food stamps) program has increased despite a corresponding drop in the unemployment rate, bucking the historical trend. The unemployment rate fell below 8 percent in 2013. On the other hand, the percentage of the U.S. population on food stamps in 2013 rose to the highest level ever, just over 15 percent at 47,600,000 persons. The orange and blue lines on the right side of the chart below demonstrate the divergence:

unnamed-1_0.png



The percentage of the population in SNAP increased in both fiscal 2012 and 2013, even as the unemployment rate fell for the third consecutive calendar year—a result inconsistent with the historic relationship between the two variables. The improvement of economic conditions during the early stage of recovery, when the unemployment rate starts to fall, takes longer to be felt by lower educated, low- wage workers who are receiving SNAP benefits. For example, the poverty rate in 2012 (the latest year available) was about the same as during the 2 previous years, suggesting that while unemployment was falling, many low-income households did not share in the economic growth. During previous economic recessions, the unemployment rate fell before SNAP participation decreased (a lagged response). It is possible that as the economy continues to recover, SNAP participation will follow but with a longer lag than following previous recessions.

Other areas explored in the report are the continued reduction in participation in the Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) program, and the increasing expenditures in the National School Lunch Program despite falling participation. The report notes that food and nutrition assistance expenditures continue to drive the growth in the USDA's budget, now accounting for 72% of USDA outlays.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs...high-even-unemployment-rate-falls_782712.html
 

Jon88

Pro Bowler
Messages
19,523
Reaction score
0
We get formula vouchers from WIC. Formula is $15 a can. Mason Barack goes through 1 can every two days. You do the math.

Food stamps is where we draw the line though. We're not on those. With her income she could get them, but we're not doing it.
 

VTA

UDFA
Messages
2,668
Reaction score
593
$15 a can? Holy shit. It's cheaper to buy milk. Even cheaper to breast feed.
 

JBond

UDFA
Messages
2,667
Reaction score
2
Kids are expensive and the costs increase the older they get. I need to find an extra $15,000 a year the next four years to pay for my sons college.
 

Jon88

Pro Bowler
Messages
19,523
Reaction score
0
$15 a can? Holy shit. It's cheaper to buy milk. Even cheaper to breast feed.

We bought a breast pump for that reason but it didn't work out.

Kids are expensive and the costs increase the older they get. I need to find an extra $15,000 a year the next four years to pay for my sons college.

My college was $1200 for a semester of 12 hours. It was a very good school too. He can go there or a place like it, but there's no way I'm paying $15,000 a year for college unless I'm somehow rich by then.
 
Top Bottom