Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
Posted by jellis at 8/30/2011 5:11 PM CDT on dallascowboys.com

IRVING, Texas - When looking at the Cowboys depth heading into final cuts over the last few years, it's often been hard to pare the roster down to 53 guys, they've been so deep with veterans.

This year is different though. The roster is top heavy, and really thins out at a lot of positions after the first name or two on the depth chart. While there are still difficult choices to make, it's a lot tougher to identify 53 must-have players on this team right now.

That means the Cowboys could be very active on the waiver wire Sunday, possibly putting in claims not only to fill several of their needs, but because they like the potential of some outsiders better than the guys they have in-house. All preseason the Cowboys have had their pro scouts on the road watching other teams in search of players who could potentially upgrade the roster after final cuts, and they're always considering every option.

Now is the times for those discussions between the scouting department, the coaches and the front office.

"I don't think a ton of specific conversations have gone on," Jason Garrett said. "There have been a couple 'Hey, these guys are stacked at this position, these guys are stacked at that position, these guys are looking for this, we're stacked at that spot,' that kind of thing. But it's been more general, and it's (scouts') job to kind of flush that stuff out for us, and by the end of this week, we'll have a lot of those conversations."

The Cowboys could be trolling for upgrades at a number of positions, including fullback, wide receiver, offensive tackle, outside linebacker, safety and kicker. And because there seem to be fewer must-keeps on the roster, they should be more flexible with potential additions.

The problem is, there aren't a lot of positions at which the Cowboys are themselves stacked.

"I don't know that we're stacked in any area," Garrett said. "We have good competition in a lot of different spots, and we have some hard decisions to make."
 

Theebs

Quality Starter
Messages
8,534
Reaction score
0
I'd sign James Sanders and drop Sensy in a hearbeat.

Oaut of curiosity why do you say this?

I think we need another vet defensive lineman, an actual inside linebacker who can help...unless lemon figures out a role and maybe a proven offensive tackle or guard who can step in.
 

jiggyfly

In the Rotation
Messages
712
Reaction score
0
I'd sign James Sanders and drop Sensy in a hearbeat.

NE is hardly happy with there starting safeties or there backups ,Chung was playing deep into the 4th quarter against Detroit and Merriweather was benched last year.

Why is Sanders a starter here if he gets cut by NE?
 

Idgit

Practice Squad
Messages
202
Reaction score
0
I'm sure they're looking at Sanders. He's not an upgrade to Sensabaugh, though, and it would be asinine to swap starting Safeties going into week one. McCray or AOA could be vulnerable, though.

What we really need is a capable swing OT. We're flapping in the breeze there, and I don't see anybody all that worried about it.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
57,907
Reaction score
8,674
What we really need is a capable swing OT. We're flapping in the breeze there, and I don't see anybody all that worried about it.

I think this might be one of the higher priorities once they start looking at all the other teams cuts. I dont think Young can much at all, and Parnell doesnt look ready.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
Sensy couldn't play well when he had 2 years to work in a scheme. I hate to see what an abbreviated camp does for him. But oh well ATL struck 1st.
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207
NE is hardly happy with there starting safeties or there backups ,Chung was playing deep into the 4th quarter against Detroit and Merriweather was benched last year.

Why is Sanders a starter here if he gets cut by NE?

I agree. People always assume that this player must be good since he played for the Patriots, despite being cut by them. People don't understand that teams like the Pats and Eagles draft players for their system, and that said players are often not as good as advertized but look extremely well in that system. That's why they can fleece teams like the Raiders for 1st round draft picks for a declining player like Seymour, that's why the Eagles can fleece teams like the Dolphins, Redskins, and soon to be Cardinals for 2nd rounders for QBs like Feeley, McNabb, and Kolb. I'd never trade for players from these teams.
 
Top Bottom