Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
ByRainer Sabin / Reporter
rsabin@dallasnews.com | Bio

2:30 PM on Mon., Jan. 30, 2012 | Permalink

When the Cowboys agreed to a five-year, $22 million contract extension with Gerald Sensabaugh in December, they made a longstanding commitment to a safety they had previously deemed worthy of a short-term investment.

The transaction invited skepticism, in part because there wasn't a marked spike in Sensabaugh's performance. In fact, by the time the Giants finished off the Cowboys on New Year's Day, Sensabuagh had fewer passes defended and interceptions than he had accumulated the year before.

He was also a featured member of a secondary that seemed as incapable of making consequential plays as it was prone to allowing them.

At the time, the decision to lengthen Sensabaugh's term of employment appeared premature especially in light of the fact that the 28-year-old never had a host of suitors courting him in the free-agent market. That perception still exists among a legion of doubters who also believe that the move itself was terribly restrictive.

Instead of having the option to choose which safety position they want to upgrade, the Cowboys have pigeonholed themselves and made Abram Elam the de facto candidate for replacement.

Yet Elam seemed to play his position just as competently as Sensabaugh did last season. Although Elam didn't defend any passes or make any interceptions, he did lead the league in coverage tackles, according to ProFootballFocus.com. He is also the only member of the Cowboys' defensive backfield who has worked under new secondary coach Jerome Henderson, who called Elam "one of the best people I know."

"He cares about his teammates, cares about football, works his butt off, studies, prepares, competes. He's tough," Henderson added. "I love the kid."

Elam's best asset is his knowledge of defensive coordinator Rob Ryan's system and his understanding of the scheme covered up the fact that he has limited range and cover skills. But as the offseason nears, Elam is set to become a free agent after the one-year, $2.5 million contract he signed with the Cowboys last summer expires. Last week, Cowboys owner Jerry Jones acknowledged that Elam's future with the team remains unclear as it looks to address the secondary's shortcomings.

"We'll have to see how it goes," Jones said. "He was a QB. He really knew the defense. It's not a given but it wouldn't be a surprise for him to be there on the team."

But if the Cowboys really want to improve the personnel at the safety position, can they afford to bring back Elam? Can progress be achieved by maintaining the status quo?

These are questions that are now being asked because of the commitment the Cowboys made to Gerald Sensabaugh in December, when they chose security over flexibility at a time when changes appeared to be on the horizon.
 

jiggyfly

In the Rotation
Messages
712
Reaction score
0
Did he really try and prop Elam for leading the team in coverage tackles?
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
yeah I'm sure if we let Elam go cmd and Dwight Schrute here will spin it that it happened because we payed Sensy so much money. IF ONLY WE COULD HAVE KEPT ELAM!
 

cmd34

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
119
yeah I'm sure if we let Elam go cmd and Dwight Schrute here will spin it that it happened because we payed Sensy so much money. IF ONLY WE COULD HAVE KEPT ELAM!


I wouldn't have signed either to an extension during the season. If we checked Free Agency and there are no equal or affordable options then we could have contemplated bring one or both of them back. We may do this with Elam.

It was an unnecessary move and have yet to see any good reason from you or anyone else why Sensabaugh needed to be extended.
 

Theebs

Quality Starter
Messages
8,534
Reaction score
0
what pigeonholed the front office is not being able to replace average players in the secondary via the draft and thus having to keep signing the elams and sensebaughs of the world.

if we could draft secondary players we wouldnt have any problems.

but pretty much most of ciskowskis secondary players have washed out sans orlando scandrick and mike jenkins. and neither of them can be relied on as backbones of the secondary either.

there going to get it right this year though. you betcha.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
I don't remember the Mathis love but I'll give you Cullen Jenkins part of one of the worst run defenses in the NFL.
 
Messages
10,636
Reaction score
0
I don't remember the Mathis love but I'll give you Cullen Jenkins part of one of the worst run defenses in the NFL.

Log into cz and advanced search it


You think them starting a 5'9" non-roided out Mathews sister at LB has something to do with that?
 
Messages
10,636
Reaction score
0
So they started a guy who couldn't beat him out in tc, even worse


In what has become almost a weekly change, the Eagles are asking their forgotten man, Casey Matthews, to return to the nickel defense this week when they travel to Miami to face the Dolphins in a battle of a 4-8 teams.

"We've got a few different personnel groups," Eagles coach Andy Reid said. "We're going to try to utilize everybody, really. Casey earned the right to get back in there. He's done well when given the opportunity on short yardage and goal line. He's done well on the scout team and he's done well in the classroom.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom