dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
58,563
Reaction score
9,053
Dak Prescott ends miserable season with pitiful finale

Dak Prescott's miserable seasons raises plenty of questions about his future
Sam Quinn - Dec 31, 3:41 PM


Dak Prescott didn't throw an interception in Sunday's 6-0 Dallas Cowboys victory over the Philadelphia Eagles. That's just about the only nice thing you can say about his pathetic performance, and it's a rarity anyway. He threw more of them this season than Blake Bortles.

The Cowboys needed three quarters just to put points on the board against a team that had nothing to play for. No, the Cowboys didn't have anything to gain by winning either, but the Eagles have a good excuse: they're already locked into the playoffs. The Cowboys had nothing to gain because Prescott couldn't muster any offense, even with Ezekiel Elliott, last week against the Seattle Seahawks. That's been a pretty common theme this season for the man who ended Tony Romo's career. The Cowboys have scored single digit points four times this season, and the Seahawks game might have been the worst of them all despite ending with 12 points on the board.

When the Cowboys played the Eagles, Prescott was supposed to match Carson Wentz throw-for-throw. Instead, he ended up doing so with third-stringer Nate Sudfeld for much of the afternoon. He showed no interest in leading the Cowboys to a win that could have provided meaningful momentum next season, and that lacking effort trickles down throughout the entire organization. Every player on the team looks to the quarterback to lead them. Prescott couldn't be bothered to do that on Sunday.

The numbers are startling. He threw 21 touchdowns this season, fewer than the 23 he had last year despite being the expected-centerpiece of the offense while Elliott was out (a role that was grabbed by Alfred Morris when it became apparent Prescott couldn't handle it). His quarterback rating of 86.7 has him behind a quarterback that was benched (Tyrod Taylor) and another that once played for the Hartford Colonials of the UFL (Josh McCown). His interceptions more than tripled, and his completion percentage dropped by over four points. His average pass traveled more than a yard shorter.
Were Prescott's seasons reversed, fans would be thrilled with the progression he made from his rookie to sophomore season. Under normal circumstances, Prescott would have played like this last season, kept the Cowboys hovering around .500 as this team did, and then handed the job back to Romo as he should have.

But circumstances lifted him to heights he had no rights reaching. He had the perfect offensive line, three All Pros and two steady starters to give him as much time to throw as necessary. Dez Bryant still looked like a No. 1 receiver, and Cole Beasley was almost as effective. Elliott was the best running back in football without a suspension hanging over his head all season.

Trent Dilfer won a Super Bowl. You can win football games without a good quarterback if the rest of the team is great. And that's what happened. A great team carried a middling quarterback to wins that would have been far more decisive with a star like Romo under center, and that convinced them that he was better than Romo. He never was. Prescott lucked into a job he didn't earn and kept it through the hard work of his teammates. He's an accidental starting quarterback.
Nothing would be wrong with that if this weren't the Cowboys. This team has the roster to win a Super Bowl right now. They have a young defense that improved by leaps and bounds this season. They have Elliott and those three All Pro's. Sure, the receiving corps needs some work and the team needs a better insurance policy for Sean Lee, but there are very few teams with more raw talent.

But there are quite a few teams with better quarterbacks. That is why the Cowboys aren't in the playoffs this season. If they want to be there next year, Prescott had better show that he deserves to be the Cowboys starter on his own merits and nobody else's. And if he can't, then let someone else give it a shot.

What was the point of playing Prescott all game? Why didn't Cooper Rush deserve a chance to prove himself after the way he played in the preseason? What has Prescott done to prove he is a franchise quarterback? The Cowboys aren't going to sign Kirk Cousins or trade for Eli Manning. They aren't going to spend this offseason trying to land a whale at the quarterback position.

But the notion that Prescott should be treated like an absolute at the quarterback position makes absolutely no sense. The Cowboys should be open to the idea that someone else deserves to lead this team. Prescott failed to do it on Sunday, and he failed to do it all season. If he fails to do it again next year, they will have lost Romo for nothing. They will have wasted a golden opportunity to compete for championships. And they will regret it for years after the fact.
 

ThoughtExperiment

Quality Starter
Messages
9,906
Reaction score
3
Yeah, I'm still shocked at how far he fell off this year. Not sure if I've seen anything like that before.
 

ThoughtExperiment

Quality Starter
Messages
9,906
Reaction score
3

I know the answer. Same idiotic reason Zeke was taking hits with 40 seconds left, deep in the red zone, in a game the Eagles clearly didn't even care about winning: It was important for Garrett and Jerry to win that game to get to 9-7 so they could sell "winning season!" and hope to the fans all offseason. Plain and simple.
 

theoneandonly

Quality Starter
Messages
5,273
Reaction score
560
OK back to my thread a few months ago, simple yes or no question: A QB they like falls to 19 do you take them? To me this a is a no brainer, you run to the podium. The best part is the QB can sit for a year while you enjoy the tail end of Dak's cheap rookie contract. They say Wade Wilson is leaving and I doubt the replacement is David Lee, the best in the business. So I dont see Dak getting fixed by this staff. I really hope this gets determined before Jerry goes all senile by throwing money at Dak based on his jersey selling ability.
 

ThoughtExperiment

Quality Starter
Messages
9,906
Reaction score
3
A few months ago I'd have said no, we have our QB. But after the last several games? I think there's only a 50% chance Dak can be the guy.

But will the team take a QB at #19? No way. Jerry is big on his "if they've done it before they can do it again" theory. He'll give Dak at least another season.
 

yimyammer

Pro Bowler
Messages
10,172
Reaction score
4,040
I know the answer. Same idiotic reason Zeke was taking hits with 40 seconds left, deep in the red zone, in a game the Eagles clearly didn't even care about winning: It was important for Garrett and Jerry to win that game to get to 9-7 so they could sell "winning season!" and hope to the fans all offseason. Plain and simple.

pathetic
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
58,563
Reaction score
9,053
I know the answer. Same idiotic reason Zeke was taking hits with 40 seconds left, deep in the red zone, in a game the Eagles clearly didn't even care about winning: It was important for Garrett and Jerry to win that game to get to 9-7 so they could sell "winning season!" and hope to the fans all offseason. Plain and simple.

Yeah I saw Jones' idiot comments about it when some reporter asked him if it was worth losing 4 or 5 spots in draft position to say you were 9-7 instead of 8-8, especially when the other team had bums on the field. And he said yes.

What he should be focused on is why did it take essentially 59 mins to put the game away with our starters against the other teams 2nd and 3rd teamers. Of course he doesn't.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
58,563
Reaction score
9,053
A few months ago I'd have said no, we have our QB. But after the last several games? I think there's only a 50% chance Dak can be the guy.

But will the team take a QB at #19? No way. Jerry is big on his "if they've done it before they can do it again" theory. He'll give Dak at least another season.

IIRC Prescott has a 4yr deal and it can't be redone until after the 3rd season. Basically it's a make or break year in 2018 for him. If his 2018 is like the 2nd half of this yr, there is no way he will get a new contract here (or at least, he shouldn't warrant a new contract)
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
58,563
Reaction score
9,053
OK back to my thread a few months ago, simple yes or no question: A QB they like falls to 19 do you take them? To me this a is a no brainer, you run to the podium. The best part is the QB can sit for a year while you enjoy the tail end of Dak's cheap rookie contract. They say Wade Wilson is leaving and I doubt the replacement is David Lee, the best in the business. So I dont see Dak getting fixed by this staff. I really hope this gets determined before Jerry goes all senile by throwing money at Dak based on his jersey selling ability.

First, yes I would after what we've seen the 2nd half of this season (The only exception might be if they know behind closed doors he was playing with some sort of injury that limited his throwing ability. Though we haven't heard that, I guess it's possible because he clearly had a huge drop off in the way he threw the ball this year, especially the 2nd half of the season)

Second, please stop with this David Lee nonsense. He is nowhere near "the best in the business"

That said, I'm not sure who would be available at 19 that they might be in love with. I think Darnold may end up staying in school (which would be the right move IMO), Rosen is going to go 1st or 2nd. If Darnold stays in school that would likely drive Josh Allen's value up. That leaves Mayfield, who I think would have some of the similar allure for Jones that Manziel did, but I don't think he'd be worth a pick that high myself. None of the other QB's should warrant 1st rd consideration IMO.
 

icup

Super Moderator
Messages
10,304
Reaction score
6,452
dallas will not pick a qb at 1 nor should they. the cowboys aren't in the business of accumulating stupid "assets." why showcase cooper rush right before the offseason in the finale vs. philly? not like a qb hungry team would bite on that in the offseason, right? not like dallas would sign a solid backup/mentor for dak on the roster again rather than keeping a newbie like rush around. dallas is in win-now mode and have been for the last 20 years. call up jameil showers and call it a day. he's probably learned so much going from qb to safety.

if there's a receiver or defensive upgrade along the dline/linebacker positions, you just go with that in the 1st. then my guess is they'll go classic tight end in the 2nd round.

and don't forget the return of randy gregory!
 

icup

Super Moderator
Messages
10,304
Reaction score
6,452
First, yes I would after what we've seen the 2nd half of this season (The only exception might be if they know behind closed doors he was playing with some sort of injury that limited his throwing ability. Though we haven't heard that, I guess it's possible because he clearly had a huge drop off in the way he threw the ball this year, especially the 2nd half of the season)

Second, please stop with this David Lee nonsense. He is nowhere near "the best in the business"

That said, I'm not sure who would be available at 19 that they might be in love with. I think Darnold may end up staying in school (which would be the right move IMO), Rosen is going to go 1st or 2nd. If Darnold stays in school that would likely drive Josh Allen's value up. That leaves Mayfield, who I think would have some of the similar allure for Jones that Manziel did, but I don't think he'd be worth a pick that high myself. None of the other QB's should warrant 1st rd consideration IMO.

i think his injury would be classified as "predictable playcalling"


but no worries, we'll have that all ironed out with a little bit more coaching up from the same coordinator, but possibly shiny new positional coaches. i mean, the head coach and o.c. have a lot of other stuff to worry about than a struggling 2nd year qb.
 
Messages
2,278
Reaction score
53
I know the answer. Same idiotic reason Zeke was taking hits with 40 seconds left, deep in the red zone, in a game the Eagles clearly didn't even care about winning: It was important for Garrett and Jerry to win that game to get to 9-7 so they could sell "winning season!" and hope to the fans all offseason. Plain and simple.

I think they are in for a big shock next season. Pretty much Idgit and Hostile are the only people left defending this garbage.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
58,563
Reaction score
9,053
i think his injury would be classified as "predictable playcalling"

Some of it is, but he missed a bunch of easy wide open guys too, and there was definitely hesitancy to let the ball fly down field on longer routes. If the guy is open the guy is open whether its predictable play calling or not.

I don't think some sort of arm/shoulder injury is out of the question. He did take a number of huge hits this year (and he got royally pummeled in Atlanta and got drilled hard several times in that first Philly game) and maybe he gutted it out.

If they were covering up some injury though, it makes playing him the entire 60 minutes a week ago all the more moronic.
 

Scot

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,924
Reaction score
6,180
You can forget the Cowboys moving on from Dak at the end of his rookie contract

In Jerry’s mind if he did it before, he can do it again. Meaning Dak showed he could play well and at a high level in his rookie year so we know he’s capable. We just gotta coach him up and get him back to that level

Now we ALL know that’s utter bullshit

But that seems to be the way Jerry thinks and operates

Just look at all the contract year warriors he has collected over the years

And watch what he does with D Law this off season
 

icup

Super Moderator
Messages
10,304
Reaction score
6,452

Scot

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,924
Reaction score
6,180
Does anyone know offhand or have this info handy...

How many time was Dak sacked last season vs this season?

I’m curious to see how that stat relates (if it does at all) with his up tick in interceptions
 

icup

Super Moderator
Messages
10,304
Reaction score
6,452
2017 int's = 13
2017 times sacked = 32

2016 int's = 4
2016 times sacked = 25
 
Top Bottom