Messages
5,432
Reaction score
0
Are the Cowboys gambling with Free?
February, 28, 2011 Feb 2810:18AM CTEmail Print Comments2
By Todd Archer

INDIANAPOLIS -- The Cowboys elected to not at least secure Doug Free’s services for 2011 by placing the franchise tag on their left tackle.

Perhaps as soon as today the team will tender Free an offer – either the first- and third-round pick compensation or just a first rounder – in case he is a restricted free agent under the new collective bargaining. If in the new collective bargaining agreement a player is granted unrestricted free agency following his fourth season, then Free would be able to sign elsewhere without any compensation.

The franchise tag for an offensive lineman is $10.1 million. Carolina tagged center Ryan Kalil, and he quickly signed to guarantee him that money this year whenever football is played. The Cowboys had some talks with Free’s agent, Jimmy Sexton, about an extension but nothing materialized.

“I guess you’re always gambling if you don’t always take the safest route,” Executive Vice President Stephen Jones said. “The money for the franchise tag is obviously significant and it’s just a decision we needed to make with where we are with our team.”

Free started every game last year at left tackle in 2010, taking over for Flozell Adams and showed the ability to protect Tony Romo’s blindside at a high level. Only 27, Free would be one of the most-sought after left tackles because of his age and experience, which could leave the Cowboys vulnerable.

With all of the uncertainty because of the CBA, teams are not sure of the financial rules going forward or just how much room they would have under the salary cap. The Cowboys can create room by cutting some veteran players and re-working the contracts of DeMarcus Ware, Miles Austin and Romo, but they also have to factor in decisions they made in 2010 to cut veterans Flozell Adams and Ken Hamlin.

It is possible some or all of the dead money from those moves could count against the 2011 cap.
 

Mr.Po

2
Messages
2,711
Reaction score
0
Only 27, Free would be one of the most-sought after left tackles because of his age and experience

Experience? He has had only one year as a starting LT. I like Free and think he has the potential for more growth at the position but would some team out there really think he is worth a 1st and 3rd?
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Experience? He has had only one year as a starting LT. I like Free and think he has the potential for more growth at the position but would some team out there really think he is worth a 1st and 3rd?

No. He's being vastly overrated by a team with no talent along the entire offensive line.

Chubby chick hanging around fatties.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
57,647
Reaction score
8,308
Yeah, let the only good young OL we have walk. Brilliant idea douche bags
 

Mr.Po

2
Messages
2,711
Reaction score
0
Yeah, let the only good young OL we have walk. Brilliant idea douche bags

Summers eve here. I didn't say I'd want him to walk but for a 1st and 3rd I think I would be inclined to take that deal.
 
C

Cr122

Guest
Like I said if someone is willing to give me a 1st and a 3rd, then I'd do it.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Anybody with a set of eyes would.

Nobody will even consider him with a 1st and 3rd tag on him. The reason being he's not good enough.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
57,647
Reaction score
8,308
Like I said if someone is willing to give me a 1st and a 3rd, then I'd do it.

Who replaces him? A draft pick? What if that pick ends up being a severe downgrade from Free? Does that make it worth it? Even if the pick pans out, does that make it worth it? We dont exactly have a stable of young OL ready to jump in here. So basically you'd be taking an already weak position, subtracting a good player and hoping to replace him with someone just as good, if not better. Thats not really a path to improvement. Thats a path down the same road we're already on with the OL.

I think the point is moot, because I doubt anyone would give up the 1&3 to take him, but thats not the purpose of tagging him if they chose to do that. The purpose would be to keep teams from prying him away.

You imrpove the OL by keeping Free, drafting a guy or two fairly high and maybe adding a vet via free agency.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Uh, thats not how that works. The worse the rest of the line is the harder his job is.

The worse the rest of the line is, the better he looks.

This fan base is so starved for offensive line talent that they make a marginal player like Doug Free suddenly worthy of a franchise tag.

If you wouldn't take a 1st and 3rd round pick for Doug Free you're a homeristic moron.

Not a single team will have interest in him if he's given that tag. Watch and see.
 
Messages
10,636
Reaction score
0
The worse the rest of the line is, the better he looks.

This fan base is so starved for offensive line talent that they make a marginal player like Doug Free suddenly worthy of a franchise tag.

If you wouldn't take a 1st and 3rd round pick for Doug Free you're a homeristic moron.

Not a single team will have interest in him if he's given that tag. Watch and see.


The worse Colombo is the less help Free can get from a chipping RB, or a TE. Football 101

I wouldnt take pick 31 and 95 for him.

Id consider it if it was somewhere near the middle but we already need to replace 2 or 3 linemen this year and the others the year after. If the CBA takes too long to get hammered out we are already going to be counting on a rookie linemen or two.

Hes the only linemen who should be here 2 years from now. Replacing the others w/ draft picks in this draft and the next one is already a roll of the dice. Now you want to add a question mark where there doesnt need to be one.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
I'm taking a ham and egg LT and filling two roster spots with players I believe will be better.

I surely can draft a better player in the first round than a JAG like Doug f'n Free. Give me a break.

BTW, no team in the league with a right handed QB would roll their protection away from the LT unless they trusted that player. I don't care how bad the RT is.

Here, Free is like awesome.

Somewhere where they have talented linemen, he's just a guy.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
It pisses me off that this ordinary player might be the LT on this team for the next 5 years.

But these are Jerry Jones' Dallas Cowboys. Just don't suck, baby.
 
Last edited:

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
LOL

Stats or anything to back this up?

Yes. I have offensive tackle stats to back it up. I keep them right here next to my F you.

What stats are there on the other side? Some random stat generator that also told us Roy Williams had a better year than Miles Austin?
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Doug Free on his best day is an okay LT. And I mean when he's like in a groove and firing on all cylinders.

It's embarrassing to settle on that kind of talent at such a critical position on the field.

It'd be no different than building your team around Jon Kitna ten years ago.
 
Messages
10,636
Reaction score
0
Ah, so you got nothing. He passes the eye ball test for every Cowboys fan. Grades out tremendously and perhaps the best run blocking LT in the league yet he needs to be replaced right away because he isnt the best at his position and its embarrassing to not have the best at every position.

I admire the schtick Skip Bayless
 
Top Bottom