- Thread starter Woodson Bible & Guns
- Start date
touchdown
Defense Wins Championships
- Messages
- 5,956
- Reaction score
- 4,886
touchdown
Defense Wins Championships
- Messages
- 5,956
- Reaction score
- 4,886
- Messages
- 59,468
- Reaction score
- 9,692
This is disappointing.
I kinda knew something was up. VR and Elon used to put stuff up on Twitter/X together daily (multiple times some days) and the last few weeks there's been nothing.
thepostmillennial.com
I kinda knew something was up. VR and Elon used to put stuff up on Twitter/X together daily (multiple times some days) and the last few weeks there's been nothing.
BREAKING: Vivek Ramaswamy to step away from DOGE due to friction with staff: report
Sources close to Musk have not spoken highly of Ramaswamy in recent weeks, with frustrations growing that the biotech multimillionaire wasn’t pulling his weight.
thepostmillennial.com
yimyammer
Pro Bowler
- Messages
- 10,386
- Reaction score
- 4,216
This is disappointing.
I kinda knew something was up. VR and Elon used to put stuff up on Twitter/X together daily (multiple times some days) and the last few weeks there's been nothing.
BREAKING: Vivek Ramaswamy to step away from DOGE due to friction with staff: report
Sources close to Musk have not spoken highly of Ramaswamy in recent weeks, with frustrations growing that the biotech multimillionaire wasn’t pulling his weight.
really disappointing if true
Something seems off though because it seems there's a groundswell on social media because of his comments surrounding H-1B. Seems the flames against him are easily fanned on social media but who are the people making claims "he's not pulling his weight"?
Come out of the shadows and give details
If I've been fooled by Vivek I want to know more and why
- Messages
- 59,468
- Reaction score
- 9,692
Vivek was there today though and right behind Musk. They also got their pic made together and posted.
yimyammer
Pro Bowler
- Messages
- 10,386
- Reaction score
- 4,216
Good, I'm hoping this is BS or grossly exaggerated by Trump haters and dems trying to divide like they did when they were making claims Trump was annoyed with Elon
touchdown
Defense Wins Championships
- Messages
- 5,956
- Reaction score
- 4,886
yimyammer
Pro Bowler
- Messages
- 10,386
- Reaction score
- 4,216
Creeper
UDFA
- Messages
- 1,937
- Reaction score
- 2,328
I hope the Trump administration challenges Joe Biden's blanket pardons of various people wo took part in multiple Trump hoaxes and investigations.
Here is the text that grants the president the power to pardon:
Article II, Section 2, Clause 1:
The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.
Vague, as usual. I few things I have read, but admittedly there are differing legal opinions:
The courts have ruled that acceptance of a pardon is an admission of guilt.
A pardon must be for a specific federal crime.
Blanket pardons are legal.
The courts have not been clear on this issue of pre-emptive pardons.
I don't think there is a clear legal precedent for the pardons Biden has issued. And, of course, there is the question of Biden's mental competence.
I think the DOJ under Trump needs to ignore Biden's pardons and force people like Schiff and Cheney to go to court to ask the court to enforce the pardons. Then the DOJ can file arguments why blanket pardons are not constitutional.
If acceptance is an admission of guilt, then each recipient must be required to declare the crime they admit they committed. A denial of guilt would be a rejection of the pardon which then allows the DOJ to charge them. This is my opinion.
Also, a pardon grants immunity from prosecution, but it does not prevent an investigation. Trump should still investigate Schiff and Cheney, among others, and force them to testify. A pardon removes their right to claim the 5th amendment protection against self incrimination. A blanket pardon means they would be forced to testify about everything and anything.
If nothing else, the DOJ can force these people to spend tens of thousands of dollars on legal fees.
But in the end, these blanket pre-emptive pardons may not even be constitutional. It would be good for the country to get a definitive ruling on it. Can a president hire a bunch of thugs to commit serious crimes, like murder, and promise them a blanket pardon?
Here is the text that grants the president the power to pardon:
Article II, Section 2, Clause 1:
The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.
Vague, as usual. I few things I have read, but admittedly there are differing legal opinions:
The courts have ruled that acceptance of a pardon is an admission of guilt.
A pardon must be for a specific federal crime.
Blanket pardons are legal.
The courts have not been clear on this issue of pre-emptive pardons.
I don't think there is a clear legal precedent for the pardons Biden has issued. And, of course, there is the question of Biden's mental competence.
I think the DOJ under Trump needs to ignore Biden's pardons and force people like Schiff and Cheney to go to court to ask the court to enforce the pardons. Then the DOJ can file arguments why blanket pardons are not constitutional.
If acceptance is an admission of guilt, then each recipient must be required to declare the crime they admit they committed. A denial of guilt would be a rejection of the pardon which then allows the DOJ to charge them. This is my opinion.
Also, a pardon grants immunity from prosecution, but it does not prevent an investigation. Trump should still investigate Schiff and Cheney, among others, and force them to testify. A pardon removes their right to claim the 5th amendment protection against self incrimination. A blanket pardon means they would be forced to testify about everything and anything.
If nothing else, the DOJ can force these people to spend tens of thousands of dollars on legal fees.
But in the end, these blanket pre-emptive pardons may not even be constitutional. It would be good for the country to get a definitive ruling on it. Can a president hire a bunch of thugs to commit serious crimes, like murder, and promise them a blanket pardon?
touchdown
Defense Wins Championships
- Messages
- 5,956
- Reaction score
- 4,886
- Messages
- 7,444
- Reaction score
- 4,423
Fuck Tom Cotton and fuck the Republicans. It's been 4 long years of underhanded treachery (actually longer) and they still want to play nice after a decisive election? I don't want to play nice. I want the agenda that the people voted for to take effect immediately. The leftist traitors must be demolished and sanity needs to come back tot he country. I don't want niceties. Fuck all of them.
yimyammer
Pro Bowler
- Messages
- 10,386
- Reaction score
- 4,216
I didnt get to finish the video above but I thought Cotton was ripping the Dems, what did he do/say wrong?