- Messages
- 3,707
- Reaction score
- 843
Hey all discuss current superbowl rams vs peroits
That's kind of an infantile mentality. You should be pulling FOR the Pats and celebrating their dynasty, which persists despite Goodell's best efforts over the last couple of decades to prevent any team from doing just exactly what they've done.Hopefully the Rams shitstomp the Pats and Brady immediately retires after the game
I’m tired of seeing them in the damn Super Bowl
The have been in 9 of the last 18 Super Bowls!
That is nearly 50% of the past two fucking decades that they have played in the Super Bowl
That's kind of an infantile mentality. You should be pulling FOR the Pats and celebrating their dynasty, which persists despite Goodell's best efforts over the last couple of decades to prevent any team from doing just exactly what they've done.
You complain about Goodell but then root against the ONE team that consistently defies his machinations? Please.
Sounds like the typical non-Dallas fan of the 70s, filling their diapers and screaming/crying over seeing Dallas in the playoffs every year and in too many Super Bowls.
More fucking power to the Pats.
That's infantile, for sure. They fucking earned their way there, nobody could stop them, it makes zero fucks what you're tired of. Like Thurman Thomas said to the crybabies bitching this same way about their 4 in a row SB visits, "If you don't like it, beat us."And I’m tired of seeing the same damn team in the Super Bowl for the last two decades
See? If you stopped there, nothing's infantile. But no, you had to go on and tack on the toddler garbage about "same team every yeeeeeeeer."I just don’t like the Pats and I live in L.A.
I want the Rams to win
Yeah I'm not a Pats fan either. I'm a football fan though and do enjoy seeing at least one organization stick it up Goodell's ass every year, year after year. Wouldn't really matter which one was doing it.I don't want New England to win; not because I'm sick of seeing them or because they're too successful. I just think they're a bunch of asshats...
I didn't have money on it but not surprised. I expected the Rams offense to be kept off the field. I expected Wade Phillips' "bend but not break" play it safe defense to do just that. Because that's what it does - keeps your D out there all day, getting worn down.Anybody who actually had money on a scoreless first quarter is either a genius or was betting drunk.
I figured they'd be held down to a degree, but I was sure there's be a field goal or two.I didn't have money on it but not surprised. I expected the Rams offense to be kept off the field. I expected Wade Phillips' "bend but not break" play it safe defense to do just that. Because that's what it does - keeps your D out there all day, getting worn down.
I'd let Anderson soften them up then bring in lightning Gurley later. Might be wassup.This is huge if Gurley stays out. Anderson's effective against teams that can't stop him, but if there's one thing NE excels against it's when they know what's obviously coming.
If that's the plan they need to execute it better. Time of possession is lopsided towards the Patriots.I'd let Anderson soften them up then bring in lightning Gurley later. Might be wassup.